H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Carlos Berlocq vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava H2H: 1-0
Carlos Berlocq holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Munoz de la Nava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carlos Berlocq leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Berlocq won the 2011 Acapulco third round 6-3 5-7 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 44
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2011* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Carlos Berlocq | 6-3 5-7 6-1 | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Berlocq | #505 | #37 | 1,086 | 1,853 | 127 | 186 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Daniel Munoz de la Nava | #1,384 | #68 | 732 | 1,761 | 9 | 28 | 24.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Berlocq | Daniel Munoz de la Nava | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #79 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #132 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #85 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2008 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #157 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #60 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #147 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #66 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #41 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #171 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2014 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #194 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #112 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #351 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |