H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Carlos Berlocq vs Denis Istomin H2H: 1-1
Carlos Berlocq and Denis Istomin are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Carlos Berlocq won the 2012 Paris Masters second round 7-6(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2012* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Carlos Berlocq | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Denis Istomin | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2012* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Denis Istomin | 4-6 6-2 6-1 | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Berlocq | #505 | #37 | 1,086 | 1,853 | 127 | 186 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Denis Istomin | #1,509 | #33 | 1,217 | 1,900 | 191 | 245 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Berlocq | Denis Istomin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #79 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #102 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #132 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #85 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #73 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #157 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #43 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 30–29 | 50.8% | #45 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #49 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #60 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #61 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2012 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #66 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–19 | 24.0% | #121 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2013 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #41 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2014 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,679 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #177 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2017 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #112 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,545 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #467 | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |