H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Carlos Berlocq vs Ernests Gulbis H2H: 1-1

Carlos Berlocq and Ernests Gulbis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2012 Winston-Salem Open first round 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carlos Berlocq
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Ernests Gulbis
LAT Age 38 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ernests Gulbis #153 6-4 7-5 Carlos Berlocq #44 Match data Aug 21, 2012* R64 Winston-Salem Open ATP 250 Hard
Carlos Berlocq #72 6-1 2-6 6-4 Ernests Gulbis #31 Match data Mar 26, 2011* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carlos Berlocq #505 #37 1,086 1,853 127 187 40.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Ernests Gulbis #893 #10 2,725 2,140 221 233 48.7% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carlos Berlocq Ernests Gulbis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 3–1 75.0% #141 1,556 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 6–14 30.0% #61 1,638 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 22–21 51.2% #53 1,810 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2009 17–26 39.5% #90 1,723 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2010 29–20 59.2% #24 1,851 0 1
22 2005 0–1 0.0% #79 1,454 0 0 2011 18–22 45.0% #61 1,776 0 2
23 2006 5–17 22.7% #132 1,428 0 0 2012 12–17 41.4% #136 1,726 0 2
24 2007 11–15 42.3% #85 1,551 0 0 2013 32–18 64.0% #24 1,940 0 4
25 2008 3–16 15.8% #157 1,450 0 0 2014 41–21 66.1% #13 1,918 0 6
26 — — — — — — — 2015 11–24 31.4% #81 1,765 0 6
27 2010 3–3 50.0% #66 1,542 0 0 2016 7–14 33.3% #151 1,785 0 6
28 2011 15–23 39.5% #60 1,657 0 0 2017 6–8 42.9% #199 1,718 0 6
29 2012 23–29 44.2% #66 1,656 0 0 2018 9–6 60.0% #95 1,814 0 6
30 2013 26–24 52.0% #41 1,827 0 1 2019 6–17 26.1% #226 1,534 0 6
31 2014 17–17 50.0% #72 1,743 0 2 2020 2–2 50.0% #181 1,563 0 6
32 2015 7–9 43.8% #111 1,693 0 2 2021 0–2 0.0% #191 1,509 0 6
33 2016 4–6 40.0% #95 1,734 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2017 12–19 38.7% #112 1,694 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2018 1–5 16.7% #139 1,667 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2019 0–3 0.0% #507 1,505 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Carlos Berlocq Ernests Gulbis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 4 7 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 13 14 27 48.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 14 18 32 43.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 18 15 33 54.5% 11 5 16 68.8% — — — — — — — —
22 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 15 16 31 48.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 4 13 17 23.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 6 9 15 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2007 0 4 4 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 21 9 30 70.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
25 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 23 14 37 62.2% 17 5 22 77.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2016 2 7 9 22.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2011 4 7 11 36.4% 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2017 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2012 7 14 21 33.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2018 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 2013 10 9 19 52.6% 15 12 27 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 2014 1 7 8 12.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2020 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 57 84 32.1% 94 112 206 45.6% 6 18 24 25.0% — — — — — 135 139 274 49.3% 66 68 134 49.3% 15 24 39 38.5% 5 2 7 71.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 307/314 of Carlos Berlocq's and 453/454 of Ernests Gulbis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Carlos Berlocq Ernests Gulbis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 8.0 2.0 63.8% 74.9% 44.3% 73.7% 42.7% 63.8% 35.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 20/20 8.3 3.9 63.1% 74.8% 47.6% 71.0% 39.1% 64.7% 33.9%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 42/43 9.8 4.2 60.0% 74.6% 50.2% 64.8% 39.0% 64.8% 36.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 43/43 9.2 3.8 62.9% 71.8% 47.3% 56.4% 41.8% 62.9% 34.7%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 49/49 8.9 3.2 63.0% 76.3% 50.9% 62.7% 34.2% 67.0% 37.1%
22 2005 1/1 1.0 4.0 59.5% 68.0% 29.4% 33.3% 0.0% 52.4% 30.8% 2011 40/40 9.3 4.3 60.8% 73.9% 47.5% 57.1% 36.9% 63.6% 34.7%
23 2006 22/22 2.2 3.0 59.9% 60.1% 45.1% 54.3% 54.5% 53.6% 38.5% 2012 29/29 11.3 5.0 58.4% 75.6% 47.7% 54.4% 37.2% 63.9% 33.9%
24 2007 23/26 3.7 1.7 61.9% 66.6% 50.1% 54.9% 40.9% 59.6% 34.5% 2013 50/50 7.8 3.6 61.1% 77.2% 51.0% 64.8% 45.0% 66.9% 39.9%
25 2008 19/19 3.3 2.3 61.7% 63.4% 43.1% 46.0% 40.2% 56.0% 37.5% 2014 62/62 10.5 3.7 60.3% 78.5% 51.2% 62.0% 41.9% 67.6% 36.8%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 35/35 9.7 5.7 58.2% 74.7% 45.5% 63.1% 39.4% 62.2% 33.4%
27 2010 6/6 1.7 2.3 60.2% 63.2% 48.1% 56.2% 38.7% 57.2% 36.3% 2016 21/21 9.5 5.0 56.4% 73.3% 48.0% 61.3% 31.9% 62.0% 33.5%
28 2011 37/38 4.0 2.9 61.8% 67.3% 48.4% 51.3% 38.1% 59.9% 39.6% 2017 14/14 10.4 5.6 54.7% 76.8% 46.1% 61.5% 31.7% 63.1% 34.8%
29 2012 51/52 3.0 2.6 65.9% 65.3% 50.3% 53.2% 39.2% 59.9% 40.1% 2018 15/15 9.7 5.9 57.1% 76.3% 49.2% 62.0% 43.5% 64.6% 34.4%
30 2013 49/50 3.3 2.3 67.8% 70.4% 50.0% 55.5% 41.8% 63.7% 37.3% 2019 23/23 7.6 4.6 55.4% 73.3% 46.3% 51.5% 39.8% 61.2% 33.2%
31 2014 33/34 3.0 2.4 67.4% 66.7% 49.6% 60.6% 43.9% 61.1% 39.8% 2020 4/4 12.3 4.5 59.9% 74.9% 60.2% 74.7% 24.4% 68.9% 30.8%
32 2015 16/16 4.3 2.1 64.4% 68.4% 48.0% 56.4% 38.8% 61.0% 37.9% 2021 2/2 4.0 5.0 53.7% 73.7% 41.0% 27.8% — 59.2% 13.4%
33 2016 10/10 2.0 2.3 71.8% 60.9% 43.6% 56.0% 58.7% 56.5% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 31/31 2.9 2.9 61.3% 65.2% 49.6% 55.6% 46.2% 59.0% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 6/6 3.0 2.0 65.0% 64.3% 46.9% 47.6% 33.3% 58.5% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 3/3 2.3 1.7 56.6% 53.3% 46.2% 36.5% 30.5% 50.1% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 307/314 3.2 2.5 64.3% 65.9% 48.5% 54.1% 42.3% 59.6% 38.1% — 453/454 9.4 4.2 60.1% 75.4% 48.9% 61.2% 38.9% 64.7% 35.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Carlos Berlocq Ernests Gulbis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1557 106.4 +0.61 -1.74 0.972 49.0% +9 — — 54.5% +0.09 3–0 (100%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.44
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1638 127.1 +1.64 -1.59 0.958 49.8% +27 -146 -146 41.5% -0.21 0–3 (0%) 3–7 (30%) 93.8 -0.98
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1810 149.1 +2.28 +0.51 1.045 50.8% -39 -165 -225 51.3% +0.16 8–9 (47%) 8–11 (42%) 102.1 -2.63
20 2003 1478 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1723 144.0 -0.05 -0.80 0.937 49.0% +7 -100 -119 42.6% -0.38 5–9 (36%) 8–10 (44%) 97.2 -2.12
21 2004 1465 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1851 159.8 +3.64 +1.63 1.123 51.4% -51 -37 — 58.1% +0.42 6–7 (46%) 12–9 (57%) 103.9 -0.88
22 2005 1454 100.8 -2.29 -5.10 0.646 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.19 2011 1776 145.2 +0.75 -1.54 0.951 49.0% +9 -28 — 42.3% -0.40 8–4 (67%) 4–13 (24%) 96.1 -0.23
23 2006 1428 113.9 -5.99 +0.03 0.831 46.6% +61 +41 — 30.6% -1.06 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 97.6 +0.77 2012 1726 133.5 +0.26 -1.91 0.941 48.9% +5 -29 -123 46.3% -0.29 5–8 (38%) 9–6 (60%) 101.4 -0.91
24 2007 1551 123.3 -2.82 -1.97 0.854 47.4% -83 +68 -87 44.3% -0.26 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) 99.9 +1.33 2013 1941 162.6 +3.27 +3.69 1.205 53.4% -4 -117 -220 60.3% +0.87 11–10 (52%) 13–10 (57%) 102.2 -3.49
25 2008 1451 116.8 -4.78 -0.93 0.851 46.7% -26 +71 — 26.1% -1.33 1–6 (14%) 3–5 (38%) 93.2 -0.25 2014 1918 165.6 +3.67 +1.09 1.137 52.1% -25 +186 -209 60.8% +0.75 13–3 (81%) 19–12 (61%) 109.5 -0.35
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1766 142.0 -1.53 -1.16 0.884 48.0% +13 +125 -70 38.8% -0.65 5–8 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 95.1 +2.08
27 2010 1542 116.3 -1.42 -0.42 0.848 46.7% — +85 — 42.9% -0.93 1–0 2–0 — +0.01 2016 1786 137.9 -1.04 -1.59 0.883 47.8% -66 +115 — 36.5% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 93.9 -0.62
28 2011 1658 141.7 -1.96 +1.98 0.989 49.4% -156 +1 -200 41.5% -0.36 5–10 (33%) 5–10 (33%) 97.6 -1.59 2017 1718 129.7 +0.08 -0.70 0.945 48.9% -62 +100 +21 43.6% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.5 -0.03
29 2012 1657 148.5 -2.64 +2.36 1.001 50.1% -91 +97 -221 45.1% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 7–8 (47%) 103.8 +1.93 2018 1815 134.1 -0.05 -0.20 0.973 49.9% -54 — +57 52.1% +0.04 5–1 (83%) 3–4 (43%) 105.6 +0.38
30 2013 1827 157.9 +0.16 +1.05 1.028 50.1% -69 -10 -393 50.0% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 99.6 -1.20 2019 1535 124.6 -2.30 -2.09 0.855 47.1% +93 +104 +202 32.7% -1.18 1–4 (20%) 5–7 (42%) 93.7 +0.02
31 2014 1744 139.2 -1.96 +1.94 1.023 50.5% -88 +143 -297 48.1% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -0.42 2020 1563 122.8 -0.48 +0.51 0.992 50.6% +114 — — 53.8% +0.31 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.23
32 2015 1693 139.3 -0.88 +1.29 0.973 49.9% -34 +75 — 46.7% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.5 -0.65 2021 1510 94.9 -2.66 -2.22 0.328 40.2% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.24
33 2016 1735 126.6 -2.73 +1.14 0.930 49.0% — +95 — 36.4% -0.59 0–1 1–1 — -0.30 2022 1483 103.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1695 138.3 -3.23 +0.60 0.906 48.3% -51 +53 -241 40.7% -0.74 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.0 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1667 119.0 -2.49 -0.73 0.689 44.3% — +27 — 20.0% -1.47 1–0 0–1 — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 1505 105.1 -3.42 -0.56 0.757 43.8% — +57 — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1853 142.9 -2.37 +0.92 0.943 48.9% -77 +59 -245 42.0% -0.41 40–56 (42%) 47–55 (46%) 98.7 -0.22 — 2141 151.4 +1.33 +0.06 1.009 50.1% -8 +11 -95 49.0% +0.01 74–72 (51%) 98–109 (47%) 99.7 -2.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.