H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Carlos Berlocq vs Ivan Dodig H2H: 1-1
Carlos Berlocq and Ivan Dodig are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carlos Berlocq leads 1–0 on clay, while Ivan Dodig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ivan Dodig won the 2013 Basel third round 2-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2013* | Basel | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Ivan Dodig | 2-0 (ret.) | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2012* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Carlos Berlocq | 6-4 6-0 | Ivan Dodig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Berlocq | #505 | #37 | 1,086 | 1,853 | 127 | 186 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ivan Dodig | #423 | #29 | 1,330 | 1,964 | 114 | 129 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Berlocq | Ivan Dodig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #79 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #132 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #422 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #85 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #180 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #157 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #60 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,916 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2012 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #66 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #95 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2013 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #41 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2014 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #147 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #336 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #112 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |