H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Carlos Berlocq vs Sergiy Stakhovsky H2H: 0-3
Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 3–0 lead over Carlos Berlocq in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2014 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2014* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 6-3 6-3 | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
| Apr 25, 2014* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
| Jan 9, 2014* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 6-4 | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
| May 5, 2013 | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(7) | Carlos Berlocq | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Berlocq | #505 | #37 | 1,086 | 1,853 | 127 | 186 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Carlos Berlocq | Sergiy Stakhovsky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #79 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #132 | 1,427 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #85 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #157 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #60 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 |
| 2012 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #66 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 |
| 2013 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #41 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 |
| 2014 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 |
| 2015 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 |
| 2016 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 |
| 2017 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #112 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 2018 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #139 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |
| 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #507 | 1,504 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 |