H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Carlos Berlocq vs Thomas Fabbiano

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Carlos Berlocq vs Thomas Fabbiano.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carlos Berlocq
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Thomas Fabbiano
ITA Age 37 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carlos Berlocq #63 7-6(1) 6-4 Thomas Fabbiano #293 Match data May 12, 2013 Q1 Q Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carlos Berlocq #505 #37 1,086 1,853 127 187 40.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Thomas Fabbiano #1,768 #70 715 1,748 27 63 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carlos Berlocq Thomas Fabbiano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #371 1,533 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #313 1,552 0 0
22 2005 0–1 0.0% #79 1,454 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2006 5–17 22.7% #132 1,428 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2007 11–15 42.3% #85 1,551 0 0 2013 0–1 0.0% #180 1,543 0 0
25 2008 3–16 15.8% #157 1,450 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — 2015 0–3 0.0% #157 1,602 0 0
27 2010 3–3 50.0% #66 1,542 0 0 2016 5–10 33.3% #124 1,613 0 0
28 2011 15–23 39.5% #60 1,657 0 0 2017 4–12 25.0% #73 1,593 0 0
29 2012 23–29 44.2% #66 1,656 0 0 2018 8–12 40.0% #101 1,670 0 0
30 2013 26–24 52.0% #41 1,827 0 1 2019 10–18 35.7% #114 1,638 0 0
31 2014 17–17 50.0% #72 1,743 0 2 2020 0–1 0.0% #172 1,593 0 0
32 2015 7–9 43.8% #111 1,693 0 2 2021 0–3 0.0% #204 1,517 0 0
33 2016 4–6 40.0% #95 1,734 0 2 2022 0–1 0.0% #317 1,526 0 0
34 2017 12–19 38.7% #112 1,694 0 2 — — — — — — —
35 2018 1–5 16.7% #139 1,667 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2019 0–3 0.0% #507 1,505 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Carlos Berlocq Thomas Fabbiano
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 4 13 17 23.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 0 4 4 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
28 2011 4 7 11 36.4% 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2017 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2012 7 14 21 33.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 2018 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 2013 10 9 19 52.6% 15 12 27 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 2014 1 7 8 12.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 27 57 84 32.1% 94 112 206 45.6% 6 18 24 25.0% — 13 37 50 26.0% 6 20 26 23.1% 8 6 14 57.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 307/314 of Carlos Berlocq's and 89/90 of Thomas Fabbiano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Carlos Berlocq Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 3.0 6.0 69.4% 66.2% 52.9% 40.0% 16.7% 62.2% 31.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 3.0 2.0 52.9% 59.5% 51.5% 40.0% — 55.7% 21.7%
22 2005 1/1 1.0 4.0 59.5% 68.0% 29.4% 33.3% 0.0% 52.4% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 22/22 2.2 3.0 59.9% 60.1% 45.1% 54.3% 54.5% 53.6% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 23/26 3.7 1.7 61.9% 66.6% 50.1% 54.9% 40.9% 59.6% 34.5% 2013 1/1 0.0 7.0 66.1% 63.9% 45.9% 75.0% 20.0% 57.8% 25.5%
25 2008 19/19 3.3 2.3 61.7% 63.4% 43.1% 46.0% 40.2% 56.0% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 3/3 1.7 3.0 68.2% 62.0% 39.1% 50.0% 42.6% 54.6% 31.2%
27 2010 6/6 1.7 2.3 60.2% 63.2% 48.1% 56.2% 38.7% 57.2% 36.3% 2016 14/15 2.0 2.6 67.4% 62.9% 44.7% 54.2% 44.3% 56.9% 38.3%
28 2011 37/38 4.0 2.9 61.8% 67.3% 48.4% 51.3% 38.1% 59.9% 39.6% 2017 16/16 1.8 3.7 63.4% 64.2% 46.4% 46.3% 25.5% 57.8% 36.2%
29 2012 51/52 3.0 2.6 65.9% 65.3% 50.3% 53.2% 39.2% 59.9% 40.1% 2018 20/20 1.9 3.4 63.5% 62.7% 51.0% 62.6% 43.4% 58.0% 38.8%
30 2013 49/50 3.3 2.3 67.8% 70.4% 50.0% 55.5% 41.8% 63.7% 37.3% 2019 28/28 2.3 3.1 65.8% 67.2% 51.4% 55.8% 37.5% 61.8% 34.6%
31 2014 33/34 3.0 2.4 67.4% 66.7% 49.6% 60.6% 43.9% 61.1% 39.8% 2020 1/1 1.0 0.0 59.5% 52.0% 29.4% 37.5% 14.3% 42.9% 38.8%
32 2015 16/16 4.3 2.1 64.4% 68.4% 48.0% 56.4% 38.8% 61.0% 37.9% 2021 3/3 1.7 2.7 69.5% 61.6% 54.2% 64.8% 30.0% 59.3% 37.4%
33 2016 10/10 2.0 2.3 71.8% 60.9% 43.6% 56.0% 58.7% 56.5% 40.5% 2022 1/1 0.0 2.0 70.1% 61.7% 40.0% 42.9% 66.7% 55.2% 32.8%
34 2017 31/31 2.9 2.9 61.3% 65.2% 49.6% 55.6% 46.2% 59.0% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 6/6 3.0 2.0 65.0% 64.3% 46.9% 47.6% 33.3% 58.5% 28.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 3/3 2.3 1.7 56.6% 53.3% 46.2% 36.5% 30.5% 50.1% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 307/314 3.2 2.5 64.3% 65.9% 48.5% 54.1% 42.3% 59.6% 38.1% — 89/90 2.0 3.2 65.2% 64.2% 48.6% 55.0% 36.9% 58.7% 36.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Carlos Berlocq Thomas Fabbiano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1491 96.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1533 103.8 -4.31 -0.06 0.843 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
20 2003 1478 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1510 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 1465 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1553 109.4 +0.96 +1.43 0.491 42.2% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.19
22 2005 1454 100.8 -2.29 -5.10 0.646 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.19 2011 1497 93.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 1428 113.9 -5.99 +0.03 0.831 46.6% +61 +41 — 30.6% -1.06 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 97.6 +0.77 2012 1521 107.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 1551 123.3 -2.82 -1.97 0.854 47.4% -83 +68 -87 44.3% -0.26 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) 99.9 +1.33 2013 1543 110.3 -3.11 +6.63 0.605 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — 0–1 — -0.16
25 2008 1451 116.8 -4.78 -0.93 0.851 46.7% -26 +71 — 26.1% -1.33 1–6 (14%) 3–5 (38%) 93.2 -0.25 2014 1468 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1602 120.4 -2.44 -1.27 0.687 42.9% — +25 — 0.0% -2.67 — 0–1 — -0.11
27 2010 1542 116.3 -1.42 -0.42 0.848 46.7% — +85 — 42.9% -0.93 1–0 2–0 — +0.01 2016 1614 119.3 -3.97 +0.55 0.888 47.8% +10 -40 — 33.3% -1.28 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) 96.9 +0.75
28 2011 1658 141.7 -1.96 +1.98 0.989 49.4% -156 +1 -200 41.5% -0.36 5–10 (33%) 5–10 (33%) 97.6 -1.59 2017 1594 119.6 -4.29 -0.09 0.859 46.6% -7 — +27 28.6% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 4–4 (50%) 99.9 +0.33
29 2012 1657 148.5 -2.64 +2.36 1.001 50.1% -91 +97 -221 45.1% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 7–8 (47%) 103.8 +1.93 2018 1670 125.6 -3.67 +1.00 0.923 48.5% -120 -92 +67 42.9% -0.43 3–4 (43%) 3–6 (33%) 100.0 +0.17
30 2013 1827 157.9 +0.16 +1.05 1.028 50.1% -69 -10 -393 50.0% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 99.6 -1.20 2019 1638 126.4 -2.10 -0.50 0.905 48.2% -70 -79 +175 41.9% -0.49 5–10 (33%) 9–8 (53%) 96.9 +0.38
31 2014 1744 139.2 -1.96 +1.94 1.023 50.5% -88 +143 -297 48.1% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -0.42 2020 1593 101.2 -3.13 -2.21 0.679 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.05
32 2015 1693 139.3 -0.88 +1.29 0.973 49.9% -34 +75 — 46.7% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.5 -0.65 2021 1517 108.6 -1.11 +1.49 0.920 48.4% — — — 33.3% -0.56 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.21
33 2016 1735 126.6 -2.73 +1.14 0.930 49.0% — +95 — 36.4% -0.59 0–1 1–1 — -0.30 2022 1526 114.6 +1.39 -0.86 0.732 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
34 2017 1695 138.3 -3.23 +0.60 0.906 48.3% -51 +53 -241 40.7% -0.74 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.0 -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1667 119.0 -2.49 -0.73 0.689 44.3% — +27 — 20.0% -1.47 1–0 0–1 — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2019 1505 105.1 -3.42 -0.56 0.757 43.8% — +57 — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1853 142.9 -2.37 +0.92 0.943 48.9% -77 +59 -245 42.0% -0.41 40–56 (42%) 47–55 (46%) 98.7 -0.22 — 1749 121.9 -3.09 +0.20 0.876 47.5% -45 -61 +120 35.6% -0.90 11–22 (33%) 17–26 (40%) 92.2 +0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.