H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Carlos Kirmayr vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 1-1
Carlos Kirmayr and Roscoe Tanner are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Carlos Kirmayr won the 1981 Wimbledon second round 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 75
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 74
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1981* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Carlos Kirmayr | 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Roscoe Tanner | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1976* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Roscoe Tanner | 8-9 9-8 6-3 6-2 | Carlos Kirmayr | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Kirmayr | #621 | #36 | 0 | 1,892 | 135 | 157 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Roscoe Tanner | #789 | #4 | 0 | 2,158 | 595 | 298 | 66.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Kirmayr | Roscoe Tanner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–9 | 0.0% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 16–10 | 61.5% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,911 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 45–30 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 66–28 | 70.2% | #14 | 1,959 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1974 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 65–24 | 73.0% | #9 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1975 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #103 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 70–28 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,012 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1976 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 52–30 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,880 | 1 | 11 |
| 26 | 1977 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #120 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 59–24 | 71.1% | #11 | 1,935 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | 1978 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #78 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 61–19 | 76.2% | #5 | 2,025 | 1 | 15 |
| 28 | 1979 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #57 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #13 | 1,993 | 1 | 16 |
| 29 | 1980 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #64 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 51–22 | 69.9% | #12 | 1,901 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | 1981 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #41 | 1,804 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,779 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 1982 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #52 | 1,779 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #36 | 1,872 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | 1983 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #249 | 1,679 | 1 | 17 |
| 33 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,661 | 1 | 17 |
| 35 | 1986 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #119 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #565 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |