H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Carlos Moya vs Arvind Parmar H2H: 1-0
Carlos Moya holds a 1–0 lead over Arvind Parmar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Carlos Moya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 2004 Cincinnati Masters second round 3-6 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 48
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2004* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Carlos Moya | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | Arvind Parmar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
| Arvind Parmar | #1,507 | #137 | 282 | 1,604 | 14 | 26 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Moya | Arvind Parmar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #250 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #210 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 | 2003 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 | 2004 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #183 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 | 2006 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #331 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |