H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Carlos Moya vs David Prinosil H2H: 1-2
David Prinosil holds a 2–1 lead over Carlos Moya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while David Prinosil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 2001 Halle third round 7-6(5) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2001* | Halle | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | David Prinosil | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | Carlos Moya | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1999* | Halle | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Carlos Moya | 6-4 6-4 | David Prinosil | Match data |
| Aug 28, 1998* | Long Island | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | David Prinosil | 6-2 6-2 | Carlos Moya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Moya | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |