H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Carlos Moya vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 0-1
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Carlos Moya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2002 Sydney third round 7-6(5) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2002* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 7-6(5) 7-6(4) | Carlos Moya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Carlos Moya | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |