H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Carlos Moya vs Ivo Karlovic H2H: 3-0
Carlos Moya holds a 3–0 lead over Ivo Karlovic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Carlos Moya leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 2008 Metz fourth round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 47
Right-Handed
211 cm / 6'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2008* | Metz | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Carlos Moya | 6-3 7-6(4) | Ivo Karlovic | Match data |
| Jan 6, 2007* | Chennai | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Carlos Moya | 6-4 7-6(6) | Ivo Karlovic | Match data |
| May 8, 2004* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Carlos Moya | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Ivo Karlovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
| Ivo Karlovic | #1,066 | #14 | 2,295 | 1,998 | 357 | 333 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Moya | Ivo Karlovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #201 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 | 2003 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #73 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 | 2004 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #61 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 | 2005 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #70 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 | 2006 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #98 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 | 2007 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #22 | 1,940 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 | 2008 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #26 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 | 2009 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,795 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 | 2010 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #73 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 | 2011 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #56 | 1,819 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 | 2012 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #100 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #78 | 1,772 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #23 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #20 | 1,970 | 0 | 8 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #80 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #100 | 1,644 | 0 | 8 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #95 | 1,668 | 0 | 8 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #147 | 1,615 | 0 | 8 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,623 | 0 | 8 |