H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Carlos Moya vs Jim Courier H2H: 1-2
Jim Courier holds a 2–1 lead over Carlos Moya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Courier leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jim Courier won the 1999 Paris Masters third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1999* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Jim Courier | 6-2 6-1 | Carlos Moya | Match data |
| Jun 25, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jim Courier | 6-3 3-6 7-6(1) 3-6 6-2 | Carlos Moya | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1999* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Carlos Moya | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Jim Courier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
| Jim Courier | #728 | #1 | 3,973 | 2,218 | 487 | 222 | 68.7% | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Moya | Jim Courier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,712 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #25 | 1,861 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 2,047 | 1 | 4 |
| 21 | 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 | 1992 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #1 | 2,086 | 3 | 9 |
| 22 | 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 | 1993 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #3 | 1,959 | 4 | 14 |
| 23 | 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 | 1994 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #13 | 1,888 | 4 | 14 |
| 24 | 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 | 1995 | 59–20 | 74.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 4 | 18 |
| 25 | 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 | 1996 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,848 | 4 | 19 |
| 26 | 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 | 1997 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,827 | 4 | 22 |
| 27 | 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 | 1998 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #77 | 1,738 | 4 | 23 |
| 28 | 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 | 1999 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,795 | 4 | 23 |
| 29 | 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #290 | 1,737 | 4 | 23 |
| 30 | 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |