H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Carlos Moya vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 1-1
Carlos Moya and Mark Woodforde are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on carpet, while Carlos Moya leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 1998 Miami Masters second round 7-6(2) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1998* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Carlos Moya | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
| Feb 29, 1996* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Mark Woodforde | 7-5 6-7(3) 6-1 | Carlos Moya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Moya | Mark Woodforde | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 |