H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Carlos Moya vs Markus Hipfl H2H: 2-0
Carlos Moya holds a 2–0 lead over Markus Hipfl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carlos Moya leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 2002 Acapulco third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2002* | Acapulco | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Carlos Moya | 6-4 6-4 | Markus Hipfl | Match data |
| May 26, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Carlos Moya | 3-6 1-6 6-4 6-2 6-4 | Markus Hipfl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
| Markus Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Moya | Markus Hipfl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |