H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Carlos Moya vs Michael Llodra H2H: 2-0
Carlos Moya holds a 2–0 lead over Michael Llodra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carlos Moya leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 2005 US Open first round 6-4 6-4 2-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Carlos Moya | 6-4 6-4 2-1 (ret.) | Michael Llodra | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2004* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Carlos Moya | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Michael Llodra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,901 | 182 | 215 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Moya | Michael Llodra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,734 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #40 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,842 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,688 | 0 | 5 |