H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Carlos Moya vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 2-1
Carlos Moya holds a 2–1 lead over Richard Krajicek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Carlos Moya leads 2–0 on clay, while Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 2000 Long Island quarterfinal W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2000* | Long Island | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Richard Krajicek | (w/o) | Carlos Moya | Match data |
| Apr 26, 1998* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | SF | Clay | Carlos Moya | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Apr 27, 1997* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Carlos Moya | 1-6 6-2 6-4 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Moya | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 |
| 32 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |