H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Carlos Moya vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 2-1 (incl. walkovers)

Carlos Moya vs Richard Krajicek: 2–0 excluding walkovers; 2–1 including 1 walkover. Across 3 main-draw results including walkovers, Carlos Moya leads 2–0 on clay, while Richard Krajicek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 2000 Long Island quarterfinal W/O.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carlos Moya
ESP Age 50 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H including walkovers
2 – 1
3 main-draw results
Richard Krajicek
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richard Krajicek #25 (w/o) Carlos Moya #59 Match data Aug 26, 2000* QF Long Island ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Carlos Moya #18 4-6 6-1 6-4 Richard Krajicek #13 Match data Apr 26, 1998* SF Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Carlos Moya #8 1-6 6-2 6-4 Richard Krajicek #5 Match data Apr 27, 1997* QF Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carlos Moya #667 #1 3,516 2,029 554 310 64.1% 1 3 0 3 13 20
Richard Krajicek #1,044 #4 3,130 2,048 408 207 66.3% 1 2 0 5 9 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carlos Moya Richard Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 11–7 61.1% #61 1,624 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 42–28 60.0% #28 1,762 0 2 1991 26–20 56.5% #45 1,746 0 1
20 1997 53–29 64.6% #7 1,817 0 3 1992 47–24 66.2% #10 1,949 0 3
21 1998 45–23 66.2% #5 1,896 1 5 1993 36–20 64.3% #15 1,884 0 4
22 1999 35–22 61.4% #23 1,761 1 5 1994 32–13 71.1% #17 1,882 0 7
23 2000 32–21 60.4% #41 1,820 1 6 1995 40–20 66.7% #11 1,834 0 9
24 2001 34–23 59.6% #19 1,736 1 7 1996 46–24 65.7% #7 1,878 1 10
25 2002 59–21 73.8% #5 1,970 1 11 1997 50–19 72.5% #11 1,958 1 13
26 2003 51–20 71.8% #7 1,905 1 14 1998 45–16 73.8% #10 1,983 1 15
27 2004 56–18 75.7% #5 1,894 1 17 1999 42–20 67.7% #10 1,881 1 17
28 2005 32–20 61.5% #31 1,801 1 18 2000 26–15 63.4% #36 1,879 1 17
29 2006 30–22 57.7% #43 1,758 1 19 — — — — — — —
30 2007 42–23 64.6% #17 1,862 1 20 2002 7–6 53.8% #112 1,836 1 17
31 2008 28–23 54.9% #42 1,802 1 20 2003 11–10 52.4% #147 1,761 1 17
32 2009 2–4 33.3% #446 1,715 1 20 — — — — — — —
33 2010 2–6 25.0% #516 1,659 1 20 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Carlos Moya Richard Krajicek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 — — — — 11 7 18 61.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 35 16 51 68.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1991 17 9 26 65.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
20 1997 25 11 36 69.4% 25 12 37 67.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 28 10 38 73.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8%
21 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 28 7 35 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 14 8 22 63.6% 11 5 16 68.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 6 5 11 54.5%
22 1999 15 11 26 57.7% 16 8 24 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 11 4 15 73.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 1 6 83.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 18 4 22 81.8%
24 2001 12 11 23 52.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 15 9 24 62.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 9 1 10 90.0% 9 10 19 47.4%
25 2002 22 12 34 64.7% 34 7 41 82.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1997 21 8 29 72.4% 5 4 9 55.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 15 5 20 75.0%
26 2003 20 12 32 62.5% 31 8 39 79.5% — — — — — — — — 1998 18 5 23 78.3% 9 4 13 69.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
27 2004 23 10 33 69.7% 30 7 37 81.1% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1999 30 12 42 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 2 8 75.0%
28 2005 16 10 26 61.5% 16 10 26 61.5% — — — — — — — — 2000 13 7 20 65.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2006 12 11 23 52.2% 18 11 29 62.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 17 12 29 58.6% 25 10 35 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
31 2008 15 12 27 55.6% 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2003 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
32 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212 144 356 59.6% 318 135 453 70.2% 12 15 27 44.4% 12 16 28 42.9% — 189 91 280 67.5% 76 43 119 63.9% 63 26 89 70.8% 80 47 127 63.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 779/864 of Carlos Moya's and 530/615 of Richard Krajicek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Carlos Moya Richard Krajicek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1995 17/18 1.7 1.1 66.9% 61.1% 56.3% 54.6% 46.0% 59.2% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 63/70 3.0 1.9 65.7% 68.1% 51.1% 53.5% 48.7% 62.1% 41.5% 1991 40/46 9.2 4.0 55.3% 77.4% 51.6% 57.8% 43.4% 65.8% 37.4%
20 1997 67/82 3.0 2.2 62.5% 67.9% 50.2% 56.8% 51.9% 60.9% 41.3% 1992 61/71 11.0 3.5 58.4% 79.2% 54.5% 65.0% 41.3% 68.9% 37.9%
21 1998 55/68 5.1 2.4 55.4% 71.4% 51.6% 58.3% 43.3% 62.3% 41.0% 1993 46/56 10.3 4.3 60.2% 81.1% 50.7% 57.7% 47.2% 69.1% 37.8%
22 1999 53/57 5.0 3.2 53.7% 69.9% 48.7% 58.0% 38.9% 60.0% 39.8% 1994 42/45 11.7 4.0 55.0% 81.2% 50.6% 70.8% 47.6% 67.7% 38.1%
23 2000 40/53 4.9 2.7 54.4% 73.7% 53.5% 62.4% 44.6% 64.5% 38.8% 1995 54/60 11.5 3.1 59.0% 79.1% 51.2% 70.1% 41.8% 67.7% 36.1%
24 2001 51/57 6.2 2.2 57.0% 74.0% 54.1% 58.8% 41.4% 65.4% 38.1% 1996 61/70 12.8 3.4 58.1% 82.1% 49.2% 60.1% 41.1% 68.2% 37.3%
25 2002 68/80 4.7 2.4 60.8% 74.9% 52.8% 60.0% 39.8% 66.2% 40.0% 1997 61/69 14.3 3.1 57.8% 85.0% 53.3% 65.0% 43.2% 71.7% 37.3%
26 2003 67/71 6.6 3.2 55.4% 75.6% 54.5% 64.5% 44.6% 66.1% 40.9% 1998 50/61 14.9 3.4 59.8% 82.3% 53.6% 57.2% 44.1% 70.7% 36.9%
27 2004 69/74 7.2 2.7 56.7% 76.9% 55.9% 63.6% 42.9% 67.7% 38.3% 1999 47/62 13.4 2.8 61.1% 82.0% 52.2% 64.0% 43.5% 70.4% 37.8%
28 2005 50/52 5.1 2.6 59.6% 73.3% 50.6% 61.5% 46.6% 64.0% 37.8% 2000 35/41 14.9 3.4 58.6% 82.2% 55.1% 59.5% 35.2% 71.0% 36.7%
29 2006 51/52 6.2 2.5 58.5% 73.3% 50.6% 63.5% 38.4% 63.9% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 64/65 5.8 2.8 61.8% 73.2% 51.6% 61.5% 44.1% 64.7% 38.3% 2002 12/13 15.7 6.6 53.3% 81.8% 49.0% 67.7% 43.4% 66.1% 34.1%
31 2008 51/51 5.2 2.5 61.4% 70.5% 54.8% 56.2% 38.8% 64.5% 34.9% 2003 21/21 12.9 5.4 52.1% 79.9% 48.0% 67.4% 45.6% 64.4% 34.7%
32 2009 6/6 5.2 4.5 54.2% 73.0% 51.5% 53.2% 38.4% 62.7% 32.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 7/8 3.6 2.1 58.8% 65.0% 47.9% 46.0% 47.9% 58.1% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 779/864 5.1 2.5 59.0% 72.2% 52.4% 59.6% 43.6% 63.9% 39.1% — 530/615 12.5 3.6 58.0% 81.2% 51.9% 63.2% 43.0% 68.9% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Carlos Moya Richard Krajicek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1625 122.9 -0.16 +0.33 1.013 50.2% — +58 — 56.1% +0.12 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 104.6 +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1762 150.4 +1.08 +3.10 1.096 51.9% -150 +75 — 56.1% +0.59 11–8 (58%) 15–13 (54%) 104.9 -0.34 1991 1746 141.4 +4.23 -0.01 1.092 51.2% -23 -142 -131 56.0% +0.54 9–9 (50%) 10–12 (45%) 101.8 -1.45
20 1997 1817 155.8 -0.08 +3.21 1.056 51.1% +14 +60 -246 57.5% +0.55 21–8 (72%) 12–21 (36%) 100.3 -1.62 1992 1949 161.3 +6.70 +1.48 1.220 53.2% +15 -266 -275 63.5% +0.94 14–9 (61%) 18–17 (51%) 104.9 -1.66
21 1998 1897 158.7 +0.95 +3.17 1.087 51.5% -44 +172 -324 62.1% +0.58 12–7 (63%) 18–8 (69%) 107.9 -2.63 1993 1885 155.4 +6.73 +0.19 1.222 53.3% -30 +5 -123 60.6% +0.72 11–8 (58%) 14–15 (48%) 98.9 -1.17
22 1999 1762 141.1 -1.24 +1.76 0.996 49.8% +2 +190 -151 59.5% +0.37 13–9 (59%) 12–11 (52%) 95.6 +1.37 1994 1883 152.7 +5.16 +0.47 1.178 52.9% -19 +63 -64 69.4% +1.08 2–6 (25%) 12–12 (50%) 93.0 +0.23
23 2000 1820 146.0 +2.45 +1.57 1.095 51.8% +9 +49 -274 60.0% +0.43 9–13 (41%) 15–11 (58%) 94.4 -3.30 1995 1835 148.6 +4.66 -0.97 1.118 51.8% +66 +23 -81 64.6% +0.80 11–8 (58%) 16–15 (52%) 98.8 +1.78
24 2001 1736 146.1 +2.90 +0.43 1.100 51.5% +41 +139 -186 58.2% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 11–9 (55%) 98.6 +1.01 1996 1879 156.6 +5.72 +0.26 1.174 52.7% -76 +74 +133 64.5% +0.84 11–4 (73%) 22–16 (58%) 108.1 +0.05
25 2002 1971 156.2 +4.12 +2.41 1.185 52.6% -42 +39 — 66.0% +0.89 19–7 (73%) 25–11 (69%) 113.0 -1.10 1997 1958 153.7 +8.64 +0.43 1.320 54.0% -8 -40 +49 69.5% +1.20 8–6 (57%) 20–22 (48%) 98.1 -0.46
26 2003 1905 153.0 +3.88 +3.65 1.207 53.2% -13 +88 — 66.7% +1.04 13–11 (54%) 17–17 (50%) 91.6 +1.32 1998 1984 154.9 +7.61 +0.20 1.259 53.5% -7 -50 +57 69.1% +1.13 17–6 (74%) 24–12 (67%) 107.8 +0.64
27 2004 1895 151.7 +4.66 +1.24 1.186 52.7% -31 +163 -252 67.7% +0.94 18–6 (75%) 20–9 (69%) 109.4 +1.49 1999 1881 155.6 +6.78 +0.75 1.279 53.6% +61 -29 +52 66.0% +1.16 5–7 (42%) 12–15 (44%) 89.7 +0.83
28 2005 1802 145.3 +1.89 +0.56 1.050 50.9% +2 +153 — 57.6% +0.36 9–9 (50%) 13–11 (54%) 94.4 +0.86 2000 1880 150.8 +7.72 -0.11 1.266 53.1% +52 -32 +50 61.1% +0.86 5–4 (56%) 8–12 (40%) 94.8 -1.68
29 2006 1759 140.5 +2.22 -0.58 1.018 50.4% +7 +122 — 54.9% +0.18 14–7 (67%) 15–10 (60%) 102.2 -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1862 154.0 +2.20 +2.02 1.085 51.5% -46 +130 — 61.4% +0.61 13–9 (59%) 15–9 (63%) 103.6 -0.30 2002 1837 125.9 +3.14 -0.36 1.008 50.0% +25 — +75 59.5% +0.32 2–3 (40%) 5–3 (63%) 98.6 -0.73
31 2008 1802 143.5 +1.18 -1.42 0.981 49.5% +3 +61 — 51.1% -0.01 15–8 (65%) 18–12 (60%) 104.9 +1.20 2003 1762 123.4 +1.62 -1.25 0.973 49.6% +3 +73 +168 48.1% +0.06 5–2 (71%) 5–8 (38%) 98.1 -0.47
32 2009 1716 107.3 -0.28 -2.72 0.875 48.1% +39 +108 — 33.3% -0.67 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1660 107.6 -1.98 -2.23 0.769 45.3% +63 +99 — 31.3% -1.31 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2030 154.8 +1.99 +1.65 1.084 51.4% -14 +105 -232 59.9% +0.53 182–116 (61%) 212–160 (57%) 103.7 -0.04 — 2049 158.4 +6.18 +0.22 1.195 52.8% +5 -20 +4 63.9% +0.89 100–72 (58%) 166–159 (51%) 99.5 -0.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.