H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Carlos Moya vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 2-0
Carlos Moya holds a 2–0 lead over Sargis Sargsian in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Carlos Moya leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 2004 Monte Carlo Masters second round 7-6(5) 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2004* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Carlos Moya | 7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
| May 30, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Carlos Moya | 6-3 7-6(3) 2-6 6-3 | Sargis Sargsian | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Moya | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |