H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Carlos Moya vs Thomas Muster H2H: 4-4

Carlos Moya and Thomas Muster are tied 4–4 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Thomas Muster leads 3–2 on clay, while Carlos Moya leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Carlos Moya won the 1999 Dubai fourth round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carlos Moya
ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 4
8 main draw meetings
Thomas Muster
AUT Age 58 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 1999* Dubai ATP 250 R16 Hard Carlos Moya #5 6-4 6-4 Thomas Muster #23 Match data
Jan 15, 1999* Sydney ATP 250 R16 Hard Thomas Muster #25 7-6(4) 7-5 Carlos Moya #5 Match data
Apr 22, 1998* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Carlos Moya #18 6-0 6-3 Thomas Muster #26 Match data
Nov 10, 1997 Tour Finals ATP Finals RR Hard Carlos Moya #7 6-2 6-3 Thomas Muster #9 Match data
May 4, 1996* Munich ATP 250 SF Clay Carlos Moya #40 6-3 6-3 Thomas Muster #2 Match data
Apr 27, 1996* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Thomas Muster #2 6-2 7-6(3) Carlos Moya #40 Match data
Apr 20, 1996* Barcelona ATP 250 SF Clay Thomas Muster #2 4-6 6-2 6-4 Carlos Moya #55 Match data
Apr 12, 1996* Estoril ATP 250 R16 Clay Thomas Muster #1 6-4 6-2 Carlos Moya #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Carlos Moya #667 #1 3,516 2,033 551 309 64.1% 1 3 0 0 16 20
Thomas Muster #1,092 #1 4,474 2,161 590 267 68.8% 1 8 0 0 35 44

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carlos Moya Thomas Muster
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1984 2–2 50.0% #311 1,533 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1985 9–8 52.9% #98 1,611 0 0
18 1995 11–7 61.1% #61 1,625 0 1 1986 18–16 52.9% #47 1,740 0 1
19 1996 42–28 60.0% #28 1,764 0 2 1987 22–16 57.9% #56 1,753 0 1
20 1997 53–29 64.6% #7 1,815 0 3 1988 47–16 74.6% #16 1,914 0 5
21 1998 45–23 66.2% #5 1,894 1 5 1989 18–10 64.3% #21 1,877 0 5
22 1999 35–22 61.4% #23 1,762 1 5 1990 45–17 72.6% #7 1,862 0 8
23 2000 32–21 60.4% #41 1,811 1 6 1991 30–18 62.5% #35 1,835 0 10
24 2001 34–23 59.6% #19 1,735 1 7 1992 39–22 63.9% #18 1,793 0 13
25 2002 59–21 73.8% #5 1,970 1 11 1993 77–21 78.6% #9 1,953 0 20
26 2003 51–20 71.8% #7 1,904 1 14 1994 54–26 67.5% #16 1,815 0 23
27 2004 53–17 75.7% #5 1,903 1 17 1995 84–17 83.2% #3 1,990 1 35
28 2005 32–20 61.5% #31 1,803 1 18 1996 65–21 75.6% #5 1,915 1 42
29 2006 30–22 57.7% #43 1,756 1 19 1997 43–23 65.2% #9 1,820 1 44
30 2007 42–23 64.6% #17 1,862 1 20 1998 32–20 61.5% #25 1,800 1 44
31 2008 28–23 54.9% #42 1,802 1 20 1999 5–11 31.2% #189 1,674 1 44
32 2009 2–4 33.3% #446 1,715 1 20 — — — — — — —
33 2010 2–6 25.0% #516 1,651 1 20 — — — — — — —
42 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 1 44
43 — — — — — — — 2011 0–2 0.0% #1075 1,608 1 44