H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Carlos Moya vs Tim Henman H2H: 4-5

Tim Henman holds a 5–4 lead over Carlos Moya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2007 Wimbledon first round 6-3 1-6 5-7 6-2 13-11.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Carlos Moya
ESP Age 50 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 – 5
9 main draw meetings
Tim Henman
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tim Henman #74 6-3 1-6 5-7 6-2 13-11 Carlos Moya #22 Match data Jun 27, 2007* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Carlos Moya #7 7-6(1) 7-5 Tim Henman #40 Match data Oct 11, 2003* SF Vienna Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Carlos Moya #26 6-4 5-7 6-3 Tim Henman #5 Match data Apr 21, 2002* SF Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Tim Henman #11 6-1 6-4 Carlos Moya #22 Match data Oct 27, 2001* SF Swiss Indoors ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Carlos Moya #5 6-4 3-6 7-5 Tim Henman #7 Match data Nov 30, 1998* SF ATP Finals ATP Finals Hard
Tim Henman #20 6-1 6-4 Carlos Moya #18 Match data Mar 19, 1998* R32 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Tim Henman #24 6-3 6-1 Carlos Moya #28 Match data Jan 12, 1997* F Sydney International World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Carlos Moya #24 4-6 6-3 6-4 Tim Henman #25 Match data Oct 30, 1996* R64 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Tim Henman #79 7-6(3) 6-4 Carlos Moya #58 Match data Mar 8, 1996* R16 ABN AMRO Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Carlos Moya #667 #1 3,516 2,029 554 310 64.1% 1 3 0 3 13 20
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,026 469 263 64.1% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carlos Moya Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 11–7 61.1% #61 1,624 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 42–28 60.0% #28 1,762 0 2 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1997 53–29 64.6% #7 1,817 0 3 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,571 0 0
21 1998 45–23 66.2% #5 1,896 1 5 1996 38–25 60.3% #29 1,811 0 0
22 1999 35–22 61.4% #23 1,761 1 5 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2000 32–21 60.4% #41 1,820 1 6 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2001 34–23 59.6% #19 1,736 1 7 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,786 0 4
25 2002 59–21 73.8% #5 1,970 1 11 2000 55–24 69.6% #10 1,939 0 6
26 2003 51–20 71.8% #7 1,905 1 14 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,922 0 8
27 2004 56–18 75.7% #5 1,894 1 17 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,888 0 9
28 2005 32–20 61.5% #31 1,801 1 18 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,971 0 11
29 2006 30–22 57.7% #43 1,758 1 19 2004 41–21 66.1% #6 1,914 0 11
30 2007 42–23 64.6% #17 1,862 1 20 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2008 28–23 54.9% #42 1,802 1 20 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,867 0 11
32 2009 2–4 33.3% #446 1,715 1 20 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,683 0 11
33 2010 2–6 25.0% #516 1,659 1 20 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Carlos Moya Tim Henman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1995 — — — — 11 7 18 61.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 35 16 51 68.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1994 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 1997 25 11 36 69.4% 25 12 37 67.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 28 7 35 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 14 12 26 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 17 9 26 65.4%
22 1999 15 11 26 57.7% 16 8 24 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 27 11 38 71.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7%
23 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 40 18 58 69.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 2001 12 11 23 52.2% 18 8 26 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1999 16 14 30 53.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 9 4 13 69.2%
25 2002 22 12 34 64.7% 34 7 41 82.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2000 41 14 55 74.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 2003 20 12 32 62.5% 31 8 39 79.5% — — — — — — — — 2001 28 12 40 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 1 6 83.3%
27 2004 23 10 33 69.7% 30 7 37 81.1% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2002 27 10 37 73.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2005 16 10 26 61.5% 16 10 26 61.5% — — — — — — — — 2003 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 8 1 9 88.9%
29 2006 12 11 23 52.2% 18 11 29 62.1% — — — — — — — — 2004 23 13 36 63.9% 11 4 15 73.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2007 17 12 29 58.6% 25 10 35 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 15 11 26 57.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2008 15 12 27 55.6% 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2006 19 13 32 59.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 2 6 66.7%
32 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2007 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212 144 356 59.6% 318 135 453 70.2% 12 15 27 44.4% 12 16 28 42.9% — 266 147 413 64.4% 56 46 102 54.9% 78 34 112 69.6% 69 36 105 65.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 779/864 of Carlos Moya's and 644/732 of Tim Henman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Carlos Moya Tim Henman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1995 17/18 1.7 1.1 66.9% 61.1% 56.3% 54.6% 46.0% 59.2% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 63/70 3.0 1.9 65.7% 68.1% 51.1% 53.5% 48.7% 62.1% 41.5% 1994 5/8 3.0 2.6 62.7% 65.7% 41.8% 48.7% 36.9% 56.9% 33.4%
20 1997 67/82 3.0 2.2 62.5% 67.9% 50.2% 56.8% 51.9% 60.9% 41.3% 1995 11/14 3.7 5.0 55.9% 69.5% 47.7% 53.7% 54.6% 60.1% 34.7%
21 1998 55/68 5.1 2.4 55.4% 71.4% 51.6% 58.3% 43.3% 62.3% 41.0% 1996 50/63 7.1 3.7 56.7% 73.9% 51.4% 58.8% 39.0% 64.4% 36.7%
22 1999 53/57 5.0 3.2 53.7% 69.9% 48.7% 58.0% 38.9% 60.0% 39.8% 1997 63/70 8.3 4.8 51.2% 80.7% 50.4% 61.5% 38.9% 65.8% 38.3%
23 2000 40/53 4.9 2.7 54.4% 73.7% 53.5% 62.4% 44.6% 64.5% 38.8% 1998 71/84 7.2 4.1 52.9% 77.8% 50.0% 54.0% 45.5% 64.6% 39.3%
24 2001 51/57 6.2 2.2 57.0% 74.0% 54.1% 58.8% 41.4% 65.4% 38.1% 1999 57/66 7.0 3.8 54.9% 76.7% 50.5% 62.0% 41.3% 64.8% 40.2%
25 2002 68/80 4.7 2.4 60.8% 74.9% 52.8% 60.0% 39.8% 66.2% 40.0% 2000 62/79 7.0 4.1 55.2% 77.1% 50.9% 68.9% 40.4% 65.4% 41.2%
26 2003 67/71 6.6 3.2 55.4% 75.6% 54.5% 64.5% 44.6% 66.1% 40.9% 2001 58/69 4.7 3.1 60.9% 74.3% 53.1% 61.1% 47.4% 66.2% 42.8%
27 2004 69/74 7.2 2.7 56.7% 76.9% 55.9% 63.6% 42.9% 67.7% 38.3% 2002 54/63 3.4 2.2 64.4% 70.8% 52.9% 63.3% 45.7% 64.3% 40.8%
28 2005 50/52 5.1 2.6 59.6% 73.3% 50.6% 61.5% 46.6% 64.0% 37.8% 2003 45/46 4.8 3.7 58.8% 72.7% 51.8% 59.3% 47.9% 64.1% 39.5%
29 2006 51/52 6.2 2.5 58.5% 73.3% 50.6% 63.5% 38.4% 63.9% 36.7% 2004 60/62 6.1 4.1 58.7% 74.2% 55.5% 59.4% 49.0% 66.6% 39.1%
30 2007 64/65 5.8 2.8 61.8% 73.2% 51.6% 61.5% 44.1% 64.7% 38.3% 2005 41/41 4.4 3.3 61.9% 73.8% 52.4% 62.5% 45.6% 65.7% 38.2%
31 2008 51/51 5.2 2.5 61.4% 70.5% 54.8% 56.2% 38.8% 64.5% 34.9% 2006 51/51 4.7 2.3 61.5% 71.5% 51.9% 59.0% 48.7% 63.8% 38.9%
32 2009 6/6 5.2 4.5 54.2% 73.0% 51.5% 53.2% 38.4% 62.7% 32.6% 2007 16/16 7.6 4.3 62.5% 69.6% 51.9% 65.9% 40.5% 62.9% 34.5%
33 2010 7/8 3.6 2.1 58.8% 65.0% 47.9% 46.0% 47.9% 58.1% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 779/864 5.1 2.5 59.0% 72.2% 52.4% 59.6% 43.6% 63.9% 39.1% — 644/732 6.0 3.7 57.7% 74.8% 51.7% 60.7% 44.4% 64.9% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Carlos Moya Tim Henman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1995 1625 122.9 -0.16 +0.33 1.013 50.2% — +58 — 56.1% +0.12 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1762 150.4 +1.08 +3.10 1.096 51.9% -150 +75 — 56.1% +0.59 11–8 (58%) 15–13 (54%) — -0.34 1994 1513 116.8 -1.59 -1.36 0.776 45.4% +47 — +42 40.0% -1.00 1–1 2–0 — -0.33
20 1997 1817 155.8 -0.08 +3.21 1.056 51.1% +14 +60 -246 57.5% +0.55 21–8 (72%) 12–21 (36%) — -1.62 1995 1572 115.6 -2.09 -1.97 0.869 47.8% 0 — +26 45.7% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.04
21 1998 1897 158.7 +0.95 +3.17 1.087 51.5% -44 +172 -324 62.1% +0.58 12–7 (63%) 18–8 (69%) — -2.63 1996 1811 143.5 +1.77 -0.36 1.030 50.5% -28 — -52 58.2% +0.39 8–11 (42%) 24–14 (63%) — -0.81
22 1999 1762 141.1 -1.24 +1.76 0.996 49.8% +2 +190 -151 59.5% +0.37 13–9 (59%) 12–11 (52%) — +1.37 1997 1896 147.8 +3.33 +0.92 1.120 51.9% 0 -414 -26 59.7% +0.52 17–9 (65%) 18–11 (62%) — +0.85
23 2000 1820 146.0 +2.45 +1.57 1.095 51.8% +9 +49 -274 60.0% +0.43 9–13 (41%) 15–11 (58%) — -3.30 1998 1961 159.5 +2.85 +2.23 1.107 52.0% -1 -493 +17 61.8% +0.65 17–12 (59%) 16–10 (62%) — -1.62
24 2001 1736 146.1 +2.90 +0.43 1.100 51.5% +41 +139 -186 58.2% +0.36 10–11 (48%) 11–9 (55%) — +1.01 1999 1787 151.2 +2.50 +2.30 1.142 52.1% -11 -152 +243 58.8% +0.71 13–13 (50%) 14–16 (47%) — +0.72
25 2002 1971 156.2 +4.12 +2.41 1.185 52.6% -42 +39 — 66.0% +0.89 19–7 (73%) 25–11 (69%) — -1.10 2000 1939 155.2 +3.31 +3.56 1.191 53.1% +29 -234 +63 66.7% +1.07 11–12 (48%) 17–10 (63%) — +0.25
26 2003 1905 153.0 +3.88 +3.65 1.207 53.2% -13 +88 — 66.7% +1.04 13–11 (54%) 17–17 (50%) — +1.32 2001 1922 152.8 +3.40 +4.67 1.266 54.3% -2 -179 +132 67.0% +1.29 11–12 (48%) 17–14 (55%) — +2.30
27 2004 1895 151.7 +4.66 +1.24 1.186 52.7% -31 +163 -252 67.7% +0.94 18–6 (75%) 20–9 (69%) — +1.49 2002 1888 153.2 +2.14 +3.42 1.145 52.4% +19 -133 +186 66.3% +1.06 14–8 (64%) 9–15 (38%) — +0.21
28 2005 1802 145.3 +1.89 +0.56 1.050 50.9% +2 +153 — 57.6% +0.36 9–9 (50%) 13–11 (54%) — +0.86 2003 1972 147.0 +1.73 +3.09 1.100 51.8% -9 -200 +151 60.0% +0.66 8–2 (80%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.72
29 2006 1759 140.5 +2.22 -0.58 1.018 50.4% +7 +122 — 54.9% +0.18 14–7 (67%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.66 2004 1914 154.9 +3.57 +2.65 1.174 52.8% +17 -34 +142 60.8% +0.86 11–7 (61%) 12–18 (40%) — +0.11
30 2007 1862 154.0 +2.20 +2.02 1.085 51.5% -46 +130 — 61.4% +0.61 13–9 (59%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.30 2005 1746 146.2 +2.43 +1.53 1.114 51.8% +62 +91 +293 55.6% +0.50 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — +0.77
31 2008 1802 143.5 +1.18 -1.42 0.981 49.5% +3 +61 — 51.1% -0.01 15–8 (65%) 18–12 (60%) — +1.20 2006 1868 152.1 +1.77 +2.07 1.076 51.4% -18 -56 +205 59.5% +0.54 5–8 (38%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.94
32 2009 1716 107.3 -0.28 -2.72 0.875 48.1% +39 +108 — 33.3% -0.67 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +1.05 2007 1684 119.8 -0.80 -0.33 0.931 49.2% +55 +34 +277 40.0% -0.34 1–8 (11%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.06
33 2010 1660 107.6 -1.98 -2.23 0.769 45.3% +63 +99 — 31.3% -1.31 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2030 154.8 +1.99 +1.65 1.084 51.4% -14 +105 -232 59.9% +0.53 182–116 (61%) 212–160 (57%) 103.7 -0.04 — 2026 155.9 +2.48 +2.23 1.121 52.1% +5 -155 +114 60.6% +0.70 125–112 (53%) 161–141 (53%) 96.1 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.