H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Carlos Moya vs Tim Henman H2H: 4-5

Tim Henman holds a 5–4 lead over Carlos Moya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 2–1 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2007 Wimbledon first round 6-3 1-6 5-7 6-2 13-11.

ESP Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2007* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Tim Henman #74 6-3 1-6 5-7 6-2 13-11 Carlos Moya #22 Match data
Oct 11, 2003* Vienna ATP 250 SF Hard Carlos Moya #7 7-6(1) 7-5 Tim Henman #40 Match data
Apr 21, 2002* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 SF Clay Carlos Moya #26 6-4 5-7 6-3 Tim Henman #5 Match data
Oct 27, 2001* Basel ATP 250 SF Carpet Tim Henman #11 6-1 6-4 Carlos Moya #22 Match data
Nov 30, 1998* Tour Finals ATP Finals SF Hard Carlos Moya #5 6-4 3-6 7-5 Tim Henman #7 Match data
Mar 19, 1998* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tim Henman #20 6-1 6-4 Carlos Moya #18 Match data
Jan 12, 1997* Sydney Outdoor ATP 250 F Hard Tim Henman #24 6-3 6-1 Carlos Moya #28 Match data
Oct 30, 1996* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Carlos Moya #24 4-6 6-3 6-4 Tim Henman #25 Match data
Mar 8, 1996* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Carpet Tim Henman #79 7-6(3) 6-4 Carlos Moya #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Carlos Moya #667 #1 3,516 2,033 551 309 64.1% 1 3 0 0 16 20
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Carlos Moya Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1995 11–7 61.1% #61 1,625 0 1
19 1996 42–28 60.0% #28 1,764 0 2 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1997 53–29 64.6% #7 1,815 0 3 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 1998 45–23 66.2% #5 1,894 1 5 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 1999 35–22 61.4% #23 1,762 1 5 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2000 32–21 60.4% #41 1,811 1 6 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2001 34–23 59.6% #19 1,735 1 7 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 2002 59–21 73.8% #5 1,970 1 11 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2003 51–20 71.8% #7 1,904 1 14 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2004 53–17 75.7% #5 1,903 1 17 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2005 32–20 61.5% #31 1,803 1 18 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2006 30–22 57.7% #43 1,756 1 19 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2007 42–23 64.6% #17 1,862 1 20 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2008 28–23 54.9% #42 1,802 1 20 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2009 2–4 33.3% #446 1,715 1 20 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11
33 2010 2–6 25.0% #516 1,651 1 20