H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Carlos Moya vs Todd Martin H2H: 1-2
Todd Martin holds a 2–1 lead over Carlos Moya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Todd Martin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Todd Martin won the 2000 US Open fourth round 6-7(3) 6-7(7) 6-1 7-6(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Todd Martin | 6-7(3) 6-7(7) 6-1 7-6(6) 6-2 | Carlos Moya | Match data |
| Aug 14, 2000 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Carlos Moya | 6-4 6-4 | Todd Martin | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1997* | Stuttgart Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Todd Martin | 6-3 7-6(2) | Carlos Moya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Moya | #667 | #1 | 3,516 | 2,033 | 551 | 309 | 64.1% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 20 |
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Carlos Moya | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #61 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #28 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 53–29 | 64.6% | #7 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,894 | 1 | 5 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #23 | 1,762 | 1 | 5 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #41 | 1,811 | 1 | 6 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #19 | 1,735 | 1 | 7 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2002 | 59–21 | 73.8% | #5 | 1,970 | 1 | 11 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2003 | 51–20 | 71.8% | #7 | 1,904 | 1 | 14 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2004 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #5 | 1,903 | 1 | 17 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2005 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,803 | 1 | 18 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2006 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #43 | 1,756 | 1 | 19 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2007 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #17 | 1,862 | 1 | 20 | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #42 | 1,802 | 1 | 20 | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #446 | 1,715 | 1 | 20 | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2010 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #516 | 1,651 | 1 | 20 | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 |