H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Casper Ruud vs Benoit Paire H2H: 4-0
Casper Ruud holds a 4–0 lead over Benoit Paire in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Casper Ruud leads 4–0 on clay. Most recently, Casper Ruud won the 2022 Geneva fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Norway
Age 27
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2022* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Casper Ruud | 6-3 6-1 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Jul 24, 2021* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Casper Ruud | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Jun 1, 2021* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Casper Ruud | 5-7 6-2 6-1 7-6(4) | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2020* | Hamburg | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Casper Ruud | 6-4 2-0 (ret.) | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| May 5, 2019* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Casper Ruud | 6-1 6-1 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | #13 | #2 | 5,850 | 2,128 | 285 | 160 | 64.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Casper Ruud | Benoit Paire | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #54 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 6 | 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,048 | 0 | 9 | 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #11 | 1,891 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #6 | 1,915 | 0 | 12 | 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 14 | 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2026 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,930 | 0 | 14 | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 |