H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC
Casper Ruud and Botic van de Zandschulp are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Casper Ruud leads 3–1 on clay, while Botic van de Zandschulp leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Casper Ruud won the 2024 Estoril Open second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 6-1 6-2 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Apr 5, 2024* | R16 | Estoril Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Casper Ruud | 7-5 7-6(1) | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Apr 12, 2023* | R32 | Monte-Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Casper Ruud | Match data | Mar 27, 2023* | R32 | Miami Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Casper Ruud | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | May 11, 2022* | R32 | Italian Open | Masters 1000 | Clay |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 7-5 6-1 | Casper Ruud | Match data | Apr 30, 2022* | QF | Munich Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | 3-6 6-4 6-3 6-4 | Casper Ruud | Match data | Sep 2, 2021* | R64 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | #24 | #2 | 5,850 | 2,127 | 292 | 165 | 63.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #41 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 127 | 126 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Casper Ruud | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #54 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2021 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,047 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2022 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,048 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2023 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #11 | 1,889 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2024 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #6 | 1,909 | 0 | 12 | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 14 | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2026 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #24 | 1,904 | 0 | 14 | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #41 | 1,864 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Casper Ruud | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2021 | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | 29 | 5 | 34 | 85.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2022 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 25 | 7 | 32 | 78.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2023 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2024 | 21 | 16 | 37 | 56.8% | 25 | 7 | 32 | 78.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2021 | 13 | 8 | 21 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2025 | 20 | 12 | 32 | 62.5% | 14 | 5 | 19 | 73.7% | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 18 | 17 | 35 | 51.4% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 27 | 2026 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2023 | 15 | 15 | 30 | 50.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 36.4% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 19 | 13 | 32 | 59.4% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Career | — | 111 | 94 | 205 | 54.1% | 176 | 63 | 239 | 73.6% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | — | 83 | 80 | 163 | 50.9% | 32 | 32 | 64 | 50.0% | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 448/457 of Casper Ruud's and 252/256 of Botic van de Zandschulp's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Casper Ruud | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1/1 | 6.0 | 3.0 | 62.7% | 73.0% | 63.6% | 33.3% | 16.7% | 69.5% | 23.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 13/13 | 3.8 | 2.5 | 67.0% | 68.3% | 52.1% | 66.1% | 44.2% | 62.4% | 32.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 15/15 | 6.0 | 2.6 | 63.5% | 69.3% | 47.3% | 61.0% | 40.1% | 61.2% | 33.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 37/37 | 3.4 | 3.3 | 64.7% | 70.6% | 52.6% | 56.9% | 46.3% | 64.4% | 37.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 31/31 | 4.3 | 1.9 | 65.9% | 70.3% | 54.8% | 62.3% | 41.9% | 64.9% | 38.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2021 | 69/71 | 4.9 | 1.9 | 63.9% | 74.0% | 56.8% | 57.3% | 49.7% | 67.9% | 39.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2022 | 66/66 | 5.9 | 2.0 | 65.3% | 75.0% | 55.6% | 59.5% | 42.8% | 68.1% | 37.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2023 | 57/57 | 5.3 | 2.9 | 63.7% | 72.0% | 54.0% | 65.3% | 39.5% | 65.5% | 38.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2024 | 65/71 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 65.6% | 72.5% | 55.4% | 56.7% | 42.6% | 66.3% | 37.7% | 2021 | 25/25 | 7.0 | 4.4 | 62.4% | 75.0% | 49.1% | 62.9% | 32.0% | 65.1% | 35.5% |
| 26 | 2025 | 50/51 | 5.8 | 2.1 | 66.5% | 73.6% | 54.8% | 54.4% | 39.8% | 67.2% | 37.4% | 2022 | 62/62 | 6.5 | 3.9 | 63.4% | 71.7% | 49.1% | 59.5% | 43.9% | 63.1% | 38.8% |
| 27 | 2026 | 44/44 | 6.1 | 2.5 | 66.3% | 71.2% | 57.1% | 58.4% | 38.4% | 66.9% | 39.1% | 2023 | 44/44 | 5.7 | 3.6 | 62.8% | 69.5% | 47.5% | 58.2% | 36.3% | 61.1% | 38.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 36/36 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 60.9% | 69.3% | 43.7% | 60.4% | 41.8% | 59.3% | 36.8% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 35/36 | 5.6 | 4.8 | 60.9% | 73.1% | 47.4% | 52.3% | 41.4% | 63.1% | 37.5% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 50/53 | 7.2 | 5.0 | 61.8% | 73.2% | 45.8% | 64.6% | 45.3% | 62.9% | 38.3% |
| Career | — | 448/457 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 65.1% | 72.5% | 55.0% | 59.0% | 42.8% | 66.4% | 37.7% | — | 252/256 | 6.2 | 4.2 | 62.2% | 71.8% | 47.1% | 59.8% | 41.0% | 62.4% | 37.8% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Casper Ruud | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2016 | 1488 | 107.1 | +0.83 | -0.30 | 0.760 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 1543 | 123.9 | -0.32 | -2.90 | 0.862 | 48.1% | -36 | +68 | — | 42.3% | -0.42 | 1–1 | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.63 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 1689 | 134.0 | -0.58 | -2.48 | 0.871 | 48.4% | -63 | +30 | — | 41.5% | -0.12 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–4 (20%) | 99.0 | -0.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 1772 | 139.3 | +0.18 | +1.21 | 1.042 | 51.2% | -121 | +103 | — | 50.6% | +0.28 | 6–4 (60%) | 4–6 (40%) | 100.4 | +0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2020 | 1860 | 150.0 | +1.68 | +2.01 | 1.101 | 51.8% | -216 | +102 | — | 54.5% | +0.56 | 6–4 (60%) | 3–7 (30%) | 99.2 | -0.82 | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2021 | 2048 | 162.4 | +4.67 | +2.55 | 1.226 | 53.5% | -90 | +70 | -454 | 68.5% | +1.25 | 14–3 (82%) | 12–8 (60%) | 110.2 | +1.70 | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2022 | 2048 | 163.8 | +4.46 | +1.52 | 1.161 | 52.5% | -17 | +133 | -461 | 64.2% | +0.91 | 11–6 (65%) | 25–12 (68%) | 105.6 | +0.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2023 | 1890 | 152.7 | +1.58 | +1.92 | 1.112 | 51.9% | -58 | +275 | — | 60.4% | +0.68 | 7–11 (39%) | 18–13 (58%) | 91.0 | +2.35 | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2024 | 1909 | 162.8 | +2.26 | +2.49 | 1.120 | 52.0% | -33 | +247 | — | 60.9% | +0.71 | 16–6 (73%) | 16–11 (59%) | 106.2 | +1.00 | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | 108.1 | -0.41 |
| 26 | 2025 | 1917 | 153.8 | +2.61 | +1.69 | 1.139 | 52.2% | -42 | +186 | — | 65.9% | +0.75 | 8–7 (53%) | 9–4 (69%) | 99.9 | +2.67 | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | 107.5 | -1.63 |
| 27 | 2026 | 1905 | 158.2 | +2.29 | +3.74 | 1.181 | 53.0% | -61 | +194 | — | 58.9% | +0.70 | 7–3 (70%) | 9–11 (45%) | 99.5 | -0.70 | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | 103.7 | +0.41 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.0 | -2.47 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | 96.4 | -1.80 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1865 | 149.1 | -1.13 | +2.52 | 1.032 | 50.8% | +24 | -159 | -224 | 56.0% | +0.25 | 7–10 (41%) | 21–11 (66%) | 103.6 | -0.28 |
| Career | — | 2128 | 160.0 | +2.53 | +1.85 | 1.121 | 52.1% | -60 | +154 | -457 | 60.4% | +0.72 | 79–48 (62%) | 99–80 (55%) | 103.4 | +1.54 | — | 1933 | 149.2 | -0.95 | +1.98 | 1.003 | 50.0% | +6 | -67 | -106 | 49.2% | -0.06 | 41–40 (51%) | 67–54 (55%) | 106.5 | -2.44 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | 4 | 5 | 9 | Oct 14, 2026 | H2H |
| Diego Schwartzman | 4 | 5 | 9 | Mar 11, 2023 | H2H |
| Jaume Munar | 7 | 1 | 8 | Apr 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Matteo Berrettini | 6 | 2 | 8 | Sep 28, 2025 | H2H |
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 5 | 3 | 8 | May 27, 2025 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |