H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Casper Ruud vs Daniil Medvedev H2H: 1-2
Daniil Medvedev holds a 2–1 lead over Casper Ruud in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Casper Ruud leads 1–0 on clay, while Daniil Medvedev leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Casper Ruud won the 2025 Mutua Madrid Open quarterfinal 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Norway
Age 27
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Russia
Age 30
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2025* | Mutua Madrid Open | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Casper Ruud | 6-3 7-5 | Daniil Medvedev | Match data |
| Nov 22, 2021* | Tour Finals | ATP Finals | SF | Hard | Daniil Medvedev | 6-4 6-2 | Casper Ruud | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2021* | Mallorca | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Daniil Medvedev | 7-5 6-1 | Casper Ruud | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | #13 | #2 | 5,850 | 2,128 | 285 | 160 | 64.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
| Daniil Medvedev | #8 | #1 | 10,780 | 2,285 | 427 | 182 | 70.1% | 1 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Casper Ruud | Daniil Medvedev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2017 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2018 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2019 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #54 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2020 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #27 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #65 | 1,739 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 53–18 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 2,033 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2022 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #3 | 2,048 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 58–21 | 73.4% | #5 | 2,126 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 2023 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #11 | 1,891 | 0 | 10 | 2020 | 24–9 | 72.7% | #4 | 2,177 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2024 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #6 | 1,915 | 0 | 12 | 2021 | 50–12 | 80.6% | #2 | 2,244 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 2025 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 14 | 2022 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #7 | 2,064 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 2026 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,930 | 0 | 14 | 2023 | 67–18 | 78.8% | #3 | 2,160 | 1 | 20 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #5 | 2,099 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 43–23 | 65.2% | #13 | 1,950 | 1 | 21 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #8 | 1,936 | 1 | 23 |