H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Casper Ruud vs Tatsuma Ito

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Casper Ruud vs Tatsuma Ito.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Casper Ruud
Norway Age 27 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Tatsuma Ito
JPN Age 38 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatsuma Ito #148 6-7(3) 6-1 6-4 Casper Ruud #94 Match data Mar 7, 2019* Q1 Q Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Casper Ruud #138 4-6 6-1 6-4 Tatsuma Ito #156 Match data Jan 15, 2018 Q1 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Tatsuma Ito #120 6-4 6-7(6) 6-1 Casper Ruud #779 Match data Mar 23, 2016* Q1 Q Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

3 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Casper Ruud #20 #2 5,850 2,127 289 163 63.9% 0 1 0 1 12 14
Tatsuma Ito #1,822 #60 725 1,726 28 57 32.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Casper Ruud Tatsuma Ito
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2016 0–1 0.0% #225 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2017 5–8 38.5% #139 1,543 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2018 6–9 40.0% #112 1,689 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2019 20–17 54.1% #54 1,772 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #313 1,460 0 0
21 2020 19–12 61.3% #27 1,860 0 1 2009 0–2 0.0% #210 1,483 0 0
22 2021 53–18 74.6% #8 2,047 0 6 2010 0–1 0.0% #183 1,491 0 0
23 2022 46–20 69.7% #3 2,048 0 9 2011 2–4 33.3% #122 1,513 0 0
24 2023 35–22 61.4% #11 1,889 0 10 2012 9–13 40.9% #79 1,634 0 0
25 2024 47–24 66.2% #6 1,909 0 12 2013 2–9 18.2% #155 1,617 0 0
26 2025 34–17 66.7% #12 1,917 0 14 2014 3–5 37.5% #93 1,660 0 0
27 2026 24–15 61.5% #20 1,895 0 14 2015 8–11 42.1% #119 1,677 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2016 3–4 42.9% #171 1,671 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2017 0–2 0.0% #153 1,625 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #148 1,590 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2019 0–3 0.0% #147 1,586 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2020 1–1 50.0% #186 1,583 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Casper Ruud Tatsuma Ito
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2016 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2017 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2019 3 8 11 27.3% 17 8 25 68.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2020 2 6 8 25.0% 17 6 23 73.9% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2021 22 11 33 66.7% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2022 20 11 31 64.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 2011 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
24 2023 12 13 25 48.0% 22 8 30 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 2024 21 16 37 56.8% 25 7 32 78.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 2 7 9 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2025 20 12 32 62.5% 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 2014 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
27 2026 7 8 15 46.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 108 92 200 54.0% 176 63 239 73.6% 5 8 13 38.5% — 19 41 60 31.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 12 20 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 443/452 of Casper Ruud's and 84/85 of Tatsuma Ito's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Casper Ruud Tatsuma Ito
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2016 1/1 6.0 3.0 62.7% 73.0% 63.6% 33.3% 16.7% 69.5% 23.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2017 13/13 3.8 2.5 67.0% 68.3% 52.1% 66.1% 44.2% 62.4% 32.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2018 15/15 6.0 2.6 63.5% 69.3% 47.3% 61.0% 40.1% 61.2% 33.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2019 37/37 3.4 3.3 64.7% 70.6% 52.6% 56.9% 46.3% 64.4% 37.1% 2008 1/1 2.0 4.0 61.5% 43.8% 45.0% 28.6% 20.0% 44.2% 37.3%
21 2020 31/31 4.3 1.9 65.9% 70.3% 54.8% 62.3% 41.9% 64.9% 38.7% 2009 2/2 3.5 3.0 55.7% 63.5% 30.4% 29.8% 75.0% 48.9% 33.3%
22 2021 69/71 4.9 1.9 63.9% 74.0% 56.8% 57.3% 49.7% 67.9% 39.3% 2010 1/1 3.0 2.0 49.2% 63.3% 48.4% 57.1% 33.3% 55.7% 25.5%
23 2022 66/66 5.9 2.0 65.3% 75.0% 55.6% 59.5% 42.8% 68.1% 37.0% 2011 6/6 3.5 3.7 55.2% 63.9% 48.4% 54.0% 24.4% 57.2% 28.9%
24 2023 57/57 5.3 2.9 63.7% 72.0% 54.0% 65.3% 39.5% 65.5% 38.4% 2012 21/22 4.0 3.5 56.3% 66.6% 50.9% 54.8% 40.0% 59.6% 36.5%
25 2024 65/71 5.8 2.1 65.6% 72.5% 55.4% 56.7% 42.6% 66.3% 37.7% 2013 11/11 3.7 3.6 56.7% 66.3% 46.9% 46.9% 38.1% 57.6% 32.9%
26 2025 50/51 5.8 2.1 66.5% 73.6% 54.8% 54.4% 39.8% 67.2% 37.4% 2014 8/8 5.9 3.6 61.4% 67.3% 49.6% 53.3% 41.7% 60.5% 34.2%
27 2026 39/39 5.8 2.5 66.7% 71.9% 57.1% 60.0% 38.9% 67.1% 38.6% 2015 19/19 4.1 2.4 60.5% 71.9% 46.6% 55.8% 30.3% 62.1% 35.4%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 7/7 4.1 3.3 61.9% 66.4% 54.6% 43.5% 71.3% 62.5% 35.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 2/2 1.5 3.5 60.9% 65.2% 51.0% 50.0% 16.7% 59.8% 25.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 4.0 6.0 53.3% 67.2% 51.8% 76.5% 38.5% 60.0% 42.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 3/3 4.3 4.3 55.4% 69.1% 44.1% 40.6% 26.3% 57.8% 36.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 2/2 7.5 2.5 70.2% 68.1% 43.8% 55.6% 36.4% 60.4% 29.7%
Career — 443/452 5.3 2.3 65.2% 72.6% 54.9% 59.1% 42.9% 66.4% 37.7% — 84/85 4.1 3.3 58.5% 67.3% 48.4% 51.6% 38.6% 59.5% 34.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Casper Ruud Tatsuma Ito
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2016 1488 107.1 +0.83 -0.30 0.760 44.5% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2017 1543 123.9 -0.32 -2.90 0.862 48.1% -36 +68 — 42.3% -0.42 1–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2018 1689 134.0 -0.58 -2.48 0.871 48.4% -63 +30 — 41.5% -0.12 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.50 2007 1485 99.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2019 1772 139.3 +0.18 +1.21 1.042 51.2% -121 +103 — 50.6% +0.28 6–4 (60%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.64 2008 1460 95.0 -3.59 -0.51 0.669 40.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.10
21 2020 1860 150.0 +1.68 +2.01 1.101 51.8% -216 +102 — 54.5% +0.56 6–4 (60%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.82 2009 1483 102.7 -1.10 +0.91 0.651 40.8% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.23
22 2021 2048 162.4 +4.67 +2.55 1.226 53.5% -90 +70 -454 68.5% +1.25 14–3 (82%) 12–8 (60%) — +1.70 2010 1492 106.5 -1.95 +7.36 0.576 42.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.10
23 2022 2048 163.8 +4.46 +1.52 1.161 52.5% -17 +133 -461 64.2% +0.91 11–6 (65%) 25–12 (68%) — +0.08 2011 1513 111.0 -3.38 -2.91 0.676 43.8% +20 — — 33.3% -1.53 1–1 2–0 — 0.00
24 2023 1890 152.7 +1.58 +1.92 1.112 51.9% -58 +275 — 60.4% +0.68 7–11 (39%) 18–13 (58%) — +2.35 2012 1635 124.2 -2.45 -0.38 0.904 48.0% -2 -103 -65 39.7% -0.91 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.56
25 2024 1909 162.8 +2.26 +2.49 1.120 52.0% -33 +247 — 60.9% +0.71 16–6 (73%) 16–11 (59%) — +1.00 2013 1618 116.8 -4.05 -1.85 0.775 45.3% +28 — — 28.6% -1.75 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.28
26 2025 1917 153.8 +2.61 +1.69 1.139 52.2% -42 +186 — 65.9% +0.75 8–7 (53%) 9–4 (69%) — +2.67 2014 1660 123.9 -2.82 -0.02 0.867 47.6% +12 — -29 37.5% -0.25 — 1–3 (25%) — +0.33
27 2026 1896 157.7 +2.32 +3.23 1.173 52.9% -70 +194 — 59.2% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.76 2015 1677 125.3 -2.21 -0.52 0.934 48.3% -19 — +54 40.4% -0.68 4–3 (57%) 4–4 (50%) — +1.59
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1671 118.1 -0.69 +0.33 0.956 49.1% +7 — — 44.4% -0.45 1–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.05
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1626 112.5 -0.78 -3.10 0.634 44.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — -0.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1591 100.3 -1.04 -2.54 1.065 51.8% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.03
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1586 115.3 -1.04 -1.28 0.863 46.6% +47 — — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 0–1 — +0.29
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1584 107.5 +1.82 +0.48 0.751 46.0% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.01
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1510 90.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1486 89.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2128 160.0 +2.53 +1.78 1.120 52.1% -60 +154 -457 60.4% +0.72 79–47 (63%) 97–79 (55%) 103.5 +1.54 — 1727 119.8 -2.33 -0.67 0.851 47.0% +6 -103 -18 35.4% -1.04 12–13 (48%) 17–14 (55%) 105.6 +3.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.