H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Cassio Motta vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 2-0
Cassio Motta holds a 2–0 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cassio Motta leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cassio Motta won the 1983 Johannesburg third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 1983* | Johannesburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Cassio Motta | 6-2 6-4 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
| Feb 25, 1983* | Delray Beach Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Cassio Motta | 6-4 7-6 | Bill Scanlon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,740 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bill Scanlon | #996 | #9 | 56 | 2,017 | 307 | 259 | 54.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cassio Motta | Bill Scanlon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 36–30 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #41 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #25 | 1,808 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #30 | 1,879 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #71 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,828 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,668 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,656 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,534 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #320 | 1,598 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |