H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Cassio Motta vs Heinz Gunthardt H2H: 2-1
Cassio Motta holds a 2–1 lead over Heinz Gunthardt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Cassio Motta leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cassio Motta won the 1984 Wembley third round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 67
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 1984* | Wembley | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Cassio Motta | 7-6 6-3 | Heinz Gunthardt | Match data |
| Apr 7, 1983* | Lisbon | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Cassio Motta | 6-3 2-6 7-5 | Heinz Gunthardt | Match data |
| Jul 17, 1982* | Zell Am See Wct | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Heinz Gunthardt | 0-6 6-4 6-1 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,740 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Heinz Gunthardt | #1,013 | #22 | 0 | 1,966 | 225 | 189 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cassio Motta | Heinz Gunthardt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #38 | 1,813 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #85 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #25 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #36 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #251 | 1,670 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,663 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |