H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Cassio Motta vs Heinz Gunthardt H2H: 2-1

Cassio Motta holds a 2–1 lead over Heinz Gunthardt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Cassio Motta leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cassio Motta won the 1984 Wembley round of 32 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cassio Motta
BRA Age 66 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Heinz Gunthardt
SUI Age 67 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cassio Motta #82 7-6 6-3 Heinz Gunthardt #29 Match data Nov 8, 1984* R32 Wembley ATP 250 Carpet
Cassio Motta #99 6-3 2-6 7-5 Heinz Gunthardt #81 Match data Apr 7, 1983* R32 Lisbon ATP 250 Clay
Heinz Gunthardt #41 0-6 6-4 6-1 Cassio Motta Match data Jul 17, 1982* QF Zell Am See Wct ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cassio Motta #576 #48 352 1,739 105 164 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Heinz Gunthardt #1,013 #22 0 1,969 225 189 54.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cassio Motta Heinz Gunthardt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1976 1–4 20.0% #210 1,496 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1977 3–6 33.3% #234 1,509 0 0
19 1979 4–8 33.3% #109 1,485 0 0 1978 25–25 50.0% #55 1,765 0 1
20 1980 0–7 0.0% #255 1,439 0 0 1979 30–23 56.6% #51 1,815 0 1
21 1981 1–3 25.0% — 1,451 0 0 1980 37–21 63.8% #26 1,834 0 4
22 1982 8–13 38.1% #86 1,540 0 0 1981 28–22 56.0% #38 1,813 0 4
23 1983 14–21 40.0% #79 1,678 0 0 1982 26–25 51.0% #85 1,722 0 4
24 1984 12–19 38.7% #107 1,617 0 0 1983 27–15 64.3% #25 1,853 0 5
25 1985 7–11 38.9% #136 1,626 0 0 1984 23–19 54.8% #31 1,779 0 5
26 1986 10–10 50.0% #49 1,667 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #36 1,820 0 5
27 1987 12–17 41.4% #122 1,628 0 0 1986 3–9 25.0% #251 1,671 0 5
28 1988 7–9 43.8% #74 1,593 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #954 1,664 0 5
29 1989 13–16 44.8% #134 1,559 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 1990 10–16 38.5% #105 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 1991 2–8 20.0% #216 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 1992 5–5 50.0% #198 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 1993 0–1 0.0% #693 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cassio Motta Heinz Gunthardt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1978 9 7 16 56.3% 9 12 21 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
20 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 15 9 24 62.5% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
21 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1980 13 6 19 68.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 11 9 20 55.0%
22 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 15 10 25 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
23 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 5 11 16 31.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 16 12 28 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
24 1984 1 10 11 9.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1983 10 4 14 71.4% 17 9 26 65.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 7 6 13 53.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
26 1986 3 4 7 42.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 9 7 16 56.3% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
27 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 5 4 9 55.6% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 33 50 83 39.8% 55 89 144 38.2% 8 12 20 40.0% 9 13 22 40.9% — 71 51 122 58.2% 101 76 177 57.1% 10 11 21 47.6% 43 51 94 45.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cassio Motta Heinz Gunthardt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1497 106.8 — — — — — +44 — 27.3% -2.09 0–1 0–1 — -0.14
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1510 115.1 — — — — +44 — — 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–1 — +0.49
19 1979 1486 110.0 — — — — — +33 — 35.5% -1.26 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.65 1978 1766 146.9 — — — — +3 -145 -225 48.8% -0.21 10–7 (59%) 9–7 (56%) 107.7 -3.10
20 1980 1440 106.6 — — — — — +18 — 16.7% -1.78 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.30 1979 1815 145.2 — — — — -9 -69 — 54.6% +0.22 11–8 (58%) 11–6 (65%) 106.3 -1.34
21 1981 1452 118.5 — — — — — +22 — 33.3% -1.17 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.11 1980 1835 148.3 — — — — +31 -59 -191 59.5% +0.48 12–8 (60%) 11–5 (69%) 105.9 -2.27
22 1982 1541 132.3 — — — — — +34 — 45.2% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 99.4 +0.01 1981 1813 148.5 — — — — -9 +4 — 53.1% +0.19 8–4 (67%) 8–6 (57%) 106.5 -2.56
23 1983 1678 136.4 — — — — -92 -123 -42 42.9% -0.93 6–9 (40%) 6–3 (67%) 105.2 -2.25 1982 1722 150.4 — — — — +6 +108 — 50.0% +0.01 5–3 (63%) 8–8 (50%) 100.4 -3.00
24 1984 1618 130.0 — — — — -81 +2 +67 45.1% -0.33 2–7 (22%) 5–5 (50%) 98.1 -1.17 1983 1853 151.4 — — — — -33 0 — 59.8% +0.76 10–9 (53%) 5–9 (36%) 96.3 -0.24
25 1985 1626 134.0 — — — — -100 +47 — 44.2% -0.62 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) 97.5 -0.73 1984 1779 140.1 — — — — -19 +105 — 50.5% +0.08 9–3 (75%) 10–13 (43%) 103.8 -0.50
26 1986 1668 121.5 — — — — -132 +54 — 49.0% -0.16 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) 101.5 -0.30 1985 1820 135.6 — — — — -43 -26 -105 50.0% +0.11 11–6 (65%) 6–11 (35%) 100.8 0.00
27 1987 1629 126.7 — — — — -92 +60 — 40.5% -0.66 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 100.4 -0.39 1986 1672 117.2 — — — — +63 +24 — 38.2% -0.35 0–4 (0%) 2–7 (22%) 88.0 +0.03
28 1988 1593 113.2 — — — — -18 +31 — 48.8% -0.22 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.41 1987 1665 110.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.32
29 1989 1560 115.7 — — — — -7 +46 — 46.7% -0.29 4–6 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +2.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 1538 112.8 — — — — +42 +29 — 35.6% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 2–5 (29%) 98.9 +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1991 1476 100.3 -2.73 -2.51 0.741 44.1% +36 +93 — 22.7% -2.05 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1992 1533 108.7 +0.71 -1.64 0.955 50.1% +8 +23 — 45.5% -0.36 1–1 1–1 — +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 1520 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1740 130.1 -1.20 -2.12 0.828 46.8% -43 +21 +8 41.9% -0.65 37–55 (40%) 31–45 (41%) 96.4 +0.63 — 1969 150.6 — — — — -3 -2 -167 52.3% +0.15 76–56 (58%) 71–74 (49%) 103.5 -3.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.