Cassio Motta
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | 2 | 4 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 16, 1987 | H2H |
| Mel Purcell | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 13, 1987 | H2H |
| Fernando Roese | 4 | 0 | 4 | Nov 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Martin Jaite | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 13, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Cassio Motta holds a 1–0 lead over Ivan Kley in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cassio Motta leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cassio Motta won the 1989 Rio de Janeiro round of 16 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassio Motta | 6-2 6-4 | Ivan Kley | Match data | Apr 14, 1989* | R16 | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,739 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ivan Kley | #777 | #81 | 105 | 1,516 | 14 | 36 | 28.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cassio Motta | Ivan Kley | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #233 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #212 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #257 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,373 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #323 | 1,380 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #291 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Cassio Motta | Ivan Kley | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1983 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1982 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1985 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1983 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1987 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1988 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | 1991 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 32 | 1992 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 33 | 50 | 83 | 39.8% | 55 | 89 | 144 | 38.2% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | — | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 4 | 20 | 24 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Cassio Motta | Ivan Kley | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1979 | 1486 | 110.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | 35.5% | -1.26 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | +0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 1440 | 106.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | 16.7% | -1.78 | 0–2 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 1452 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 1541 | 132.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | 45.2% | -0.26 | 3–7 (30%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1983 | 1678 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | -92 | -123 | -42 | 42.9% | -0.93 | 6–9 (40%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -2.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 1618 | 130.0 | — | — | — | — | -81 | +2 | +67 | 45.1% | -0.33 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | -1.17 | 1982 | 1482 | 95.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.33 |
| 25 | 1985 | 1626 | 134.0 | — | — | — | — | -100 | +47 | — | 44.2% | -0.62 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–6 (25%) | — | -0.73 | 1983 | 1491 | 103.8 | — | — | — | — | +54 | — | — | 45.5% | +0.09 | 0–1 | — | — | +1.44 |
| 26 | 1986 | 1668 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | -132 | +54 | — | 49.0% | -0.16 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–4 (20%) | — | -0.30 | 1984 | 1497 | 99.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -0.80 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.20 |
| 27 | 1987 | 1629 | 126.7 | — | — | — | — | -92 | +60 | — | 40.5% | -0.66 | 7–6 (54%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.39 | 1985 | 1429 | 93.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +5 | — | 22.6% | -1.58 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | +1.50 |
| 28 | 1988 | 1593 | 113.2 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +31 | — | 48.8% | -0.22 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.41 | 1986 | 1477 | 108.6 | — | — | — | — | +108 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.55 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.68 |
| 29 | 1989 | 1560 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +46 | — | 46.7% | -0.29 | 4–6 (40%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | +2.16 | 1987 | 1403 | 106.7 | — | — | — | — | +156 | -14 | — | 16.7% | -2.40 | 0–2 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.28 |
| 30 | 1990 | 1538 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | +42 | +29 | — | 35.6% | -0.90 | 4–3 (57%) | 2–5 (29%) | — | +1.44 | 1988 | 1374 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | +143 | — | — | 9.1% | -3.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.05 |
| 31 | 1991 | 1476 | 100.3 | -2.73 | -2.51 | 0.741 | 44.1% | +36 | +93 | — | 22.7% | -2.05 | 1–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.60 | 1989 | 1381 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | +126 | — | — | 42.9% | -0.29 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.37 |
| 32 | 1992 | 1533 | 108.7 | +0.71 | -1.64 | 0.955 | 50.1% | +8 | +23 | — | 45.5% | -0.36 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.41 | 1990 | 1416 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | +125 | — | — | 57.1% | -0.14 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.42 |
| 33 | 1993 | 1520 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1740 | 130.1 | -1.20 | -2.12 | 0.828 | 46.8% | -43 | +21 | +8 | 41.9% | -0.65 | 37–55 (40%) | 31–45 (41%) | 96.4 | +0.63 | — | 1516 | 103.7 | — | — | — | — | +115 | -2 | — | 29.3% | -1.39 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–4 (60%) | 100.4 | +10.34 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | 2 | 4 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 16, 1987 | H2H |
| Mel Purcell | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 13, 1987 | H2H |
| Fernando Roese | 4 | 0 | 4 | Nov 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Martin Jaite | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 13, 1990 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 2 | 2 | Feb 10, 1990 | H2H |
| Fernando Roese | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jan 29, 1987 | H2H |
| Javier Frana | 1 | 1 | 2 | Nov 27, 1986 | H2H |
| Damir Keretic | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 19, 1985 | H2H |
| Alejandro Aramburu | 1 | 0 | 1 | Feb 9, 1990 | — |