H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Cassio Motta vs Johan Kriek H2H: 1-2

Johan Kriek holds a 2–1 lead over Cassio Motta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Johan Kriek leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Cassio Motta leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Cassio Motta won the 1989 Charleston round of 16 7-5 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cassio Motta
BRA Age 66 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Johan Kriek
USA Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cassio Motta #76 7-5 7-5 Johan Kriek #34 Match data May 12, 1989* R16 Charleston ATP 250 Clay
Johan Kriek #13 6-3 6-1 Cassio Motta #72 Match data Mar 29, 1984* R32 Miami Open ATP 250 Hard
Johan Kriek #15 6-2 7-5 Cassio Motta Match data Nov 26, 1983* SF South African Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cassio Motta #576 #48 352 1,739 105 164 39.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Johan Kriek #859 #7 268 2,053 380 223 63.0% 2 0 0 0 12 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cassio Motta Johan Kriek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1979 4–8 33.3% #109 1,485 0 0 1977 1–2 33.3% — 1,510 0 0
20 1980 0–7 0.0% #255 1,439 0 0 1978 22–11 66.7% #27 1,782 0 0
21 1981 1–3 25.0% — 1,451 0 0 1979 33–22 60.0% #35 1,862 0 1
22 1982 8–13 38.1% #86 1,540 0 0 1980 39–24 61.9% #17 1,972 0 1
23 1983 14–21 40.0% #79 1,678 0 0 1981 38–15 71.7% #19 1,954 1 4
24 1984 12–19 38.7% #107 1,617 0 0 1982 41–21 66.1% #9 1,962 2 7
25 1985 7–11 38.9% #136 1,626 0 0 1983 39–19 67.2% #15 1,953 2 10
26 1986 10–10 50.0% #49 1,667 0 0 1984 37–17 68.5% #13 1,917 2 12
27 1987 12–17 41.4% #122 1,628 0 0 1985 43–21 67.2% #14 1,908 2 13
28 1988 7–9 43.8% #74 1,593 0 0 1986 21–14 60.0% #23 1,863 2 13
29 1989 13–16 44.8% #134 1,559 0 0 1987 26–20 56.5% #48 1,735 2 14
30 1990 10–16 38.5% #105 1,538 0 0 1988 25–18 58.1% #39 1,787 2 14
31 1991 2–8 20.0% #216 1,475 0 0 1989 12–10 54.5% #52 1,700 2 14
32 1992 5–5 50.0% #198 1,532 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #413 1,683 2 14
33 1993 0–1 0.0% #693 1,519 0 0 1991 3–7 30.0% #274 1,611 2 14
34 — — — — — — — 1992 0–1 0.0% #1097 1,593 2 14

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cassio Motta Johan Kriek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1977 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
21 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1979 17 8 25 68.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9%
22 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 16 9 25 64.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 20 12 32 62.5%
23 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 5 11 16 31.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 20 3 23 87.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
24 1984 1 10 11 9.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1982 11 6 17 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 17 8 25 68.0%
25 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 16 7 23 69.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 8 6 14 57.1%
26 1986 3 4 7 42.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 6 6 12 50.0%
27 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 20 10 30 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 5 14 64.3%
28 1988 6 4 10 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
29 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1987 19 12 31 61.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1990 5 4 9 55.6% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 17 11 28 60.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
31 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
32 1992 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1993 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 33 50 83 39.8% 55 89 144 38.2% 8 12 20 40.0% 9 13 22 40.9% — 168 101 269 62.5% 26 26 52 50.0% 85 32 117 72.6% 101 64 165 61.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cassio Motta Johan Kriek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1979 1486 110.0 — — — — — +33 — 35.5% -1.26 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +0.65 1977 1510 107.6 — — — — +46 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02
20 1980 1440 106.6 — — — — — +18 — 16.7% -1.78 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.30 1978 1782 136.9 — — — — +25 -221 — 61.9% +0.76 8–5 (62%) 9–4 (69%) — +2.47
21 1981 1452 118.5 — — — — — +22 — 33.3% -1.17 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.11 1979 1862 149.4 — — — — +23 -302 -259 55.6% +0.44 10–3 (77%) 7–4 (64%) — -2.15
22 1982 1541 132.3 — — — — — +34 — 45.2% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.01 1980 1972 159.2 — — — — +53 — -325 58.6% +0.56 14–10 (58%) 13–8 (62%) — -5.59
23 1983 1678 136.4 — — — — -92 -123 -42 42.9% -0.93 6–9 (40%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.25 1981 1955 142.9 — — — — -47 -363 +33 65.9% +0.70 6–0 (100%) 15–4 (79%) — +0.70
24 1984 1618 130.0 — — — — -81 +2 +67 45.1% -0.33 2–7 (22%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.17 1982 1962 157.3 — — — — +5 -398 +50 61.3% +0.80 14–7 (67%) 16–10 (62%) — -3.28
25 1985 1626 134.0 — — — — -100 +47 — 44.2% -0.62 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.73 1983 1953 150.2 — — — — +24 -328 +86 59.6% +0.58 17–3 (85%) 12–10 (55%) — -1.61
26 1986 1668 121.5 — — — — -132 +54 — 49.0% -0.16 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.30 1984 1918 146.2 — — — — -47 -258 +141 63.1% +0.71 12–9 (57%) 14–11 (56%) — -1.32
27 1987 1629 126.7 — — — — -92 +60 — 40.5% -0.66 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.39 1985 1908 150.1 — — — — +32 — +92 61.3% +0.86 11–4 (73%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.23
28 1988 1593 113.2 — — — — -18 +31 — 48.8% -0.22 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.41 1986 1864 141.9 — — — — -4 -100 — 52.9% +0.03 11–4 (73%) 9–8 (53%) — -1.64
29 1989 1560 115.7 — — — — -7 +46 — 46.7% -0.29 4–6 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +2.16 1987 1735 137.6 — — — — +31 0 +199 52.4% +0.17 9–3 (75%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.53
30 1990 1538 112.9 — — — — +42 +29 — 35.6% -0.90 4–3 (57%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.44 1988 1787 141.9 — — — — +27 -88 +71 54.9% +0.42 9–8 (53%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.26
31 1991 1476 100.3 -2.73 -2.51 0.741 44.1% +36 +93 — 22.7% -2.05 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.60 1989 1701 126.3 — — — — +60 — +98 50.9% +0.11 4–1 (80%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.30
32 1992 1533 108.7 +0.71 -1.64 0.955 50.1% +8 +23 — 45.5% -0.36 1–1 1–1 — +0.41 1990 1683 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04
33 1993 1520 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.03 1991 1612 105.7 -0.37 -1.49 0.860 47.3% +75 — +134 34.8% -1.09 0–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.64
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1593 98.2 -3.07 -0.54 0.818 45.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.09
Career — 1740 130.1 -1.20 -2.12 0.828 46.8% -43 +21 +8 41.9% -0.65 37–55 (40%) 31–45 (41%) 96.4 +0.63 — 2054 152.6 -0.71 -1.37 0.855 47.0% +19 -242 +56 58.3% +0.51 125–60 (68%) 126–95 (57%) 109.9 -2.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.