Cassio Motta
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | 2 | 4 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 16, 1987 | H2H |
| Mel Purcell | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 13, 1987 | H2H |
| Fernando Roese | 4 | 0 | 4 | Nov 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Martin Jaite | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 13, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Jose Luis Damiani holds a 1–0 lead over Cassio Motta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jose Luis Damiani leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jose Luis Damiani won the 1979 Wimbledon round of 128 7-5 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jose Luis Damiani | 7-5 6-3 6-4 | Cassio Motta | Match data | Jun 27, 1979* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,739 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jose Luis Damiani | #503 | #32 | 0 | 1,781 | 50 | 64 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cassio Motta | Jose Luis Damiani | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #148 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #92 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Cassio Motta | Jose Luis Damiani | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1979 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 1983 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 21 | 14 | 35 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 12 | 17 | 29 | 41.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 1986 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 33 | 50 | 83 | 39.8% | 55 | 89 | 144 | 38.2% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | — | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 46 | 50 | 96 | 47.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Cassio Motta | Jose Luis Damiani | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1979 | 1486 | 110.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | 35.5% | -1.26 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | +0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 1440 | 106.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +18 | — | 16.7% | -1.78 | 0–2 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 1452 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.11 | 1978 | 1580 | 124.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +44 | — | 50.0% | -0.11 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.03 |
| 22 | 1982 | 1541 | 132.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | 45.2% | -0.26 | 3–7 (30%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.4 | +0.01 | 1979 | 1512 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | +14 | +22 | — | 26.3% | -1.55 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–5 (17%) | 96.5 | +0.22 |
| 23 | 1983 | 1678 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | -92 | -123 | -42 | 42.9% | -0.93 | 6–9 (40%) | 6–3 (67%) | 105.2 | -2.25 | 1980 | 1612 | 137.8 | — | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | 51.5% | -0.06 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–0 | — | -0.09 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1618 | 130.0 | — | — | — | — | -81 | +2 | +67 | 45.1% | -0.33 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–5 (50%) | 98.1 | -1.17 | 1981 | 1731 | 143.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | 55.0% | +0.32 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–3 (50%) | 100.4 | -1.33 |
| 25 | 1985 | 1626 | 134.0 | — | — | — | — | -100 | +47 | — | 44.2% | -0.62 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–6 (25%) | 97.5 | -0.73 | 1982 | 1637 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | -123 | +23 | — | 39.5% | -0.80 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–7 (36%) | 93.9 | +0.04 |
| 26 | 1986 | 1668 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | -132 | +54 | — | 49.0% | -0.16 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–4 (20%) | 101.5 | -0.30 | 1983 | 1592 | 104.9 | — | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | 30.0% | -1.30 | — | — | — | +0.59 |
| 27 | 1987 | 1629 | 126.7 | — | — | — | — | -92 | +60 | — | 40.5% | -0.66 | 7–6 (54%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.4 | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 1593 | 113.2 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +31 | — | 48.8% | -0.22 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 1560 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +46 | — | 46.7% | -0.29 | 4–6 (40%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.4 | +2.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 1538 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | +42 | +29 | — | 35.6% | -0.90 | 4–3 (57%) | 2–5 (29%) | 98.9 | +1.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 1476 | 100.3 | -2.73 | -2.51 | 0.741 | 44.1% | +36 | +93 | — | 22.7% | -2.05 | 1–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 1533 | 108.7 | +0.71 | -1.64 | 0.955 | 50.1% | +8 | +23 | — | 45.5% | -0.36 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 1520 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1740 | 130.1 | -1.20 | -2.12 | 0.828 | 46.8% | -43 | +21 | +8 | 41.9% | -0.65 | 37–55 (40%) | 31–45 (41%) | 96.4 | +0.63 | — | 1781 | 140.4 | — | — | — | — | -68 | +29 | — | 44.2% | -0.45 | 12–15 (44%) | 11–15 (42%) | 95.0 | -0.47 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | 2 | 4 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 16, 1987 | H2H |
| Mel Purcell | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 13, 1987 | H2H |
| Fernando Roese | 4 | 0 | 4 | Nov 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Martin Jaite | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 13, 1990 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balazs Taroczy | 0 | 5 | 5 | Oct 23, 1982 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 0 | 4 | 4 | Dec 19, 1982 | H2H |
| Jose Higueras | 2 | 1 | 3 | Nov 19, 1982 | H2H |
| Jose Luis Clerc | 1 | 2 | 3 | Oct 22, 1982 | H2H |
| Paolo Bertolucci | 1 | 2 | 3 | May 20, 1982 | H2H |