H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Cassio Motta vs Marko Ostoja H2H: 1-1
Cassio Motta and Marko Ostoja are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Cassio Motta won the 1990 Gstaad third round 2-6 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 65
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 1990* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Cassio Motta | 2-6 6-4 7-5 | Marko Ostoja | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1981* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marko Ostoja | 7-6 7-6 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,740 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marko Ostoja | #1,220 | #74 | 92 | 1,711 | 77 | 136 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cassio Motta | Marko Ostoja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #203 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #203 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #95 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #166 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #467 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |