H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Cassio Motta vs Raul Ramirez H2H: 1-0
Cassio Motta holds a 1–0 lead over Raul Ramirez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cassio Motta leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Cassio Motta won the 1983 Wimbledon first round 7-6 6-1 2-6 3-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 73
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1983* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Cassio Motta | 7-6 6-1 2-6 3-2 (ret.) | Raul Ramirez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,740 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Raul Ramirez | #744 | #4 | 0 | 2,146 | 531 | 261 | 67.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 20 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cassio Motta | Raul Ramirez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #26 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 69–35 | 66.3% | #19 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 67–29 | 69.8% | #13 | 1,983 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 96–33 | 74.4% | #5 | 2,054 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 65–25 | 72.2% | #8 | 1,984 | 0 | 14 |
| 25 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 70–29 | 70.7% | #8 | 1,949 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #40 | 1,878 | 0 | 17 |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #35 | 1,789 | 0 | 18 |
| 28 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #32 | 1,870 | 0 | 18 |
| 29 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 28–13 | 68.3% | #26 | 1,809 | 0 | 19 |
| 30 | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #74 | 1,837 | 0 | 20 |
| 31 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |