H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Cassio Motta vs Thomaz Koch H2H: 0-1
Thomaz Koch holds a 1–0 lead over Cassio Motta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thomaz Koch leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thomaz Koch won the 1980 Roland Garros first round 6-7 6-3 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 81
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1980* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Thomaz Koch | 6-7 6-3 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,740 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thomaz Koch | #857 | #24 | 0 | 1,873 | 200 | 157 | 56.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cassio Motta | Thomaz Koch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 34–18 | 65.4% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 24–13 | 64.9% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,717 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #204 | 1,704 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #62 | 1,743 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #58 | 1,803 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #263 | 1,706 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #85 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #49 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,627 | 0 | 6 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #240 | 1,592 | 0 | 6 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 |