Cassio Motta
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | 2 | 4 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 16, 1987 | H2H |
| Mel Purcell | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 13, 1987 | H2H |
| Fernando Roese | 4 | 0 | 4 | Nov 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Martin Jaite | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 13, 1990 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Cassio Motta holds a 2–0 lead over Zoltan Kuharszky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cassio Motta leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cassio Motta won the 1985 Munich Open round of 32 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassio Motta | 6-3 6-4 | Zoltan Kuharszky | Match data | Apr 9, 1985* | R32 | Munich Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Cassio Motta | 6-1 6-4 | Zoltan Kuharszky | Match data | Feb 15, 1984* | R64 | La Quinta | ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,739 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Zoltan Kuharszky | #1,044 | #53 | 0 | 1,723 | 43 | 72 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cassio Motta | Zoltan Kuharszky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #309 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #88 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #77 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #326 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #608 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Cassio Motta | Zoltan Kuharszky | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 19 | 1979 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1981 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1982 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1982 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 1983 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1983 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 1 | 10 | 11 | 9.1% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1984 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1985 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1985 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% |
| 26 | 1986 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 33 | 50 | 83 | 39.8% | 55 | 89 | 144 | 38.2% | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 9 | 13 | 22 | 40.9% | — | 6 | 14 | 20 | 30.0% | 28 | 44 | 72 | 38.9% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Cassio Motta | Zoltan Kuharszky | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 19 | 1979 | 1486 | 110.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | 35.5% | -1.26 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | +0.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1980 | 1440 | 106.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +17 | — | 16.7% | -1.78 | 0–2 | 1–3 (25%) | — | -0.30 | 1980 | 1483 | 94.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.23 |
| 21 | 1981 | 1452 | 118.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.11 | 1981 | 1478 | 105.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.11 |
| 22 | 1982 | 1541 | 132.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | 45.2% | -0.26 | 3–7 (30%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.4 | +0.01 | 1982 | 1566 | 127.2 | — | — | — | — | +54 | -17 | — | 46.5% | -0.22 | 4–3 (57%) | 4–6 (40%) | 101.4 | +2.61 |
| 23 | 1983 | 1678 | 136.4 | — | — | — | — | -92 | -123 | -42 | 42.9% | -0.93 | 6–9 (40%) | 6–3 (67%) | 105.2 | -2.25 | 1983 | 1601 | 118.0 | — | — | — | — | -22 | -49 | -38 | 40.0% | -0.45 | 6–4 (60%) | 0–5 (0%) | 100.9 | +0.21 |
| 24 | 1984 | 1618 | 130.0 | — | — | — | — | -81 | +2 | +67 | 45.1% | -0.33 | 2–7 (22%) | 5–5 (50%) | 98.1 | -1.17 | 1984 | 1643 | 131.7 | — | — | — | — | -80 | +8 | — | 43.5% | -0.49 | 5–3 (63%) | 2–2 (50%) | 104.6 | -1.49 |
| 25 | 1985 | 1626 | 134.0 | — | — | — | — | -100 | +47 | — | 44.2% | -0.62 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–6 (25%) | 97.5 | -0.73 | 1985 | 1467 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | +36 | +42 | — | 26.5% | -1.59 | 2–6 (25%) | 3–4 (43%) | 94.4 | +1.49 |
| 26 | 1986 | 1668 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | -132 | +54 | — | 49.0% | -0.16 | 4–1 (80%) | 1–4 (20%) | 101.5 | -0.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1987 | 1629 | 126.7 | — | — | — | — | -92 | +60 | — | 40.5% | -0.66 | 7–6 (54%) | 1–3 (25%) | 100.4 | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 1593 | 113.2 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +31 | — | 48.8% | -0.22 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.41 | 1988 | 1449 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | +0.01 |
| 29 | 1989 | 1560 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | -6 | +46 | — | 46.7% | -0.29 | 4–6 (40%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.4 | +2.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 1538 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | +42 | +29 | — | 35.6% | -0.90 | 4–3 (57%) | 2–5 (29%) | 98.9 | +1.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1991 | 1476 | 100.3 | -2.73 | -2.51 | 0.741 | 44.1% | +36 | +93 | — | 22.7% | -2.05 | 1–1 | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1992 | 1533 | 108.7 | +0.71 | -1.64 | 0.955 | 50.1% | +8 | +23 | — | 45.5% | -0.36 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1993 | 1520 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1740 | 130.1 | -1.20 | -2.12 | 0.828 | 46.8% | -43 | +21 | +8 | 41.9% | -0.65 | 37–55 (40%) | 31–45 (41%) | 96.4 | +0.63 | — | 1723 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -9 | -38 | 40.0% | -0.64 | 17–19 (47%) | 10–18 (36%) | 99.0 | +2.59 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luiz Mattar | 2 | 4 | 6 | Nov 9, 1990 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 16, 1987 | H2H |
| Mel Purcell | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 13, 1987 | H2H |
| Fernando Roese | 4 | 0 | 4 | Nov 8, 1990 | H2H |
| Martin Jaite | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 13, 1990 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colin Dowdeswell | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 11, 1984 | H2H |
| Alberto Tous | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 15, 1985 | H2H |
| Cassio Motta | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 9, 1985 | H2H |
| Jan Gunnarsson | 0 | 2 | 2 | Apr 3, 1985 | H2H |
| Paul Mcnamee | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 28, 1985 | H2H |