H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Cecil Mamiit vs Chris Guccione H2H: 0-1

Chris Guccione holds a 1–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chris Guccione leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Guccione won the 2003 Indianapolis round of 64 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cecil Mamiit
PHI Age 50 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Chris Guccione
AUS Age 41 Left-Handed 201 cm / 6'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Chris Guccione #528 6-1 6-3 Cecil Mamiit #145 Match data Jul 23, 2003* R64 Indianapolis ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cecil Mamiit #1,573 #72 625 1,631 48 95 33.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Chris Guccione #986 #67 926 1,681 36 59 37.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cecil Mamiit Chris Guccione
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2003 2–2 50.0% #462 1,482 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2004 2–2 50.0% #281 1,540 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2005 3–3 50.0% #155 1,586 0 0
20 1996 0–4 0.0% #200 1,471 0 0 2006 1–3 25.0% #153 1,543 0 0
21 1997 2–7 22.2% #229 1,441 0 0 2007 8–15 34.8% #91 1,524 0 0
22 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,432 0 0 2008 11–18 37.9% #96 1,560 0 0
23 1999 16–18 47.1% #93 1,552 0 0 2009 7–8 46.7% #136 1,619 0 0
24 2000 6–12 33.3% #121 1,537 0 0 2010 0–2 0.0% #376 1,554 0 0
25 2001 10–18 35.7% #111 1,555 0 0 2011 1–3 25.0% #256 1,584 0 0
26 2002 8–14 36.4% #111 1,555 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #570 1,644 0 0
27 2003 3–15 16.7% #183 1,433 0 0 2013 1–1 50.0% #520 1,640 0 0
28 2004 1–3 25.0% #226 1,492 0 0 2014 0–1 0.0% #980 1,664 0 0
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #209 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2008 1–1 50.0% #462 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cecil Mamiit Chris Guccione
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
20 1996 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 6 9 15 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 10 13 23 43.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 1999 13 12 25 52.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2009 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2001 8 14 22 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2011 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 39 71 110 35.5% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 13 17 23.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — 29 41 70 41.4% 1 6 7 14.3% 6 12 18 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/143 of Cecil Mamiit's and 94/95 of Chris Guccione's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cecil Mamiit Chris Guccione
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 4/4 18.0 5.5 59.7% 83.3% 51.5% 76.8% 50.0% 70.5% 33.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/4 12.0 3.0 55.7% 84.5% 53.8% 74.2% 26.2% 71.2% 28.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/6 12.8 4.5 58.1% 76.4% 54.5% 33.9% 17.5% 67.3% 32.2%
20 1996 3/4 2.7 5.3 45.4% 60.2% 51.2% 50.2% 42.9% 55.3% 33.2% 2006 4/4 19.8 4.8 59.3% 76.5% 44.7% 58.0% 41.7% 63.5% 26.2%
21 1997 8/9 4.4 2.0 59.6% 67.9% 47.4% 49.8% 55.1% 59.7% 35.8% 2007 23/23 15.7 3.6 58.3% 78.3% 53.8% 65.4% 26.3% 68.0% 28.5%
22 1998 1/1 3.0 2.0 61.5% 70.8% 56.7% 42.9% 80.0% 65.4% 42.9% 2008 28/29 14.9 2.6 62.0% 79.7% 52.6% 72.1% 36.1% 69.4% 26.6%
23 1999 32/34 2.6 3.0 57.3% 65.9% 47.7% 50.8% 38.8% 58.0% 39.6% 2009 15/15 13.7 3.4 59.7% 79.1% 49.9% 67.5% 36.4% 67.8% 29.2%
24 2000 14/18 2.4 2.8 54.3% 67.2% 48.8% 56.2% 38.3% 59.0% 36.7% 2010 2/2 12.5 1.0 63.6% 74.2% 59.8% 65.0% 0.0% 69.6% 19.6%
25 2001 23/28 4.2 3.0 58.1% 67.3% 49.1% 61.8% 35.1% 59.7% 36.4% 2011 4/4 13.0 3.5 60.3% 80.8% 46.3% 82.6% 56.3% 67.3% 30.0%
26 2002 20/22 3.5 3.3 57.9% 66.7% 49.9% 60.6% 39.4% 59.5% 37.2% 2012 1/1 7.0 6.0 53.9% 68.8% 43.9% 20.0% 40.0% 57.3% 33.3%
27 2003 18/18 1.8 2.7 62.6% 62.6% 42.3% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 34.4% 2013 2/2 8.5 2.0 72.0% 90.6% 51.5% 50.0% 54.2% 79.0% 45.8%
28 2004 4/4 3.8 1.8 51.5% 68.5% 51.2% 54.3% 24.2% 59.9% 37.9% 2014 1/1 13.0 1.0 64.7% 81.8% 41.7% 66.7% 0.0% 67.6% 18.0%
29 2005 3/3 3.7 2.0 68.5% 74.3% 58.9% 36.4% 27.8% 69.5% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2/2 5.5 2.0 60.9% 72.3% 51.4% 61.1% 54.2% 63.8% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128/143 3.1 2.9 58.0% 66.4% 48.2% 54.5% 39.5% 58.8% 37.1% — 94/95 14.6 3.3 60.1% 79.3% 51.9% 66.2% 33.1% 68.5% 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cecil Mamiit Chris Guccione
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1483 106.2 +0.35 -0.92 1.125 52.1% — — — 60.0% +0.50 0–2 4–1 (80%) — +0.38
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1540 116.2 +1.58 -2.45 0.978 50.0% +18 — — 50.0% +0.10 — 2–1 (67%) — -0.04
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1586 111.9 +2.37 -2.26 0.985 48.7% — — +20 42.1% -0.63 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
20 1996 1471 104.3 +1.39 -2.25 0.743 44.8% +17 — — 18.2% -2.27 0–2 1–1 — -0.21 2006 1543 108.6 +0.30 -2.26 0.719 46.7% -25 — — 20.0% -0.90 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.30
21 1997 1441 108.9 -1.33 -0.30 0.887 47.8% +21 — — 30.4% -1.17 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.42 2007 1525 119.6 +2.74 -5.40 0.891 48.7% +37 -14 +27 40.3% -0.56 3–6 (33%) 11–11 (50%) — +0.16
22 1998 1432 101.1 -0.76 -1.41 1.238 53.7% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.13 2008 1560 127.5 +4.75 -7.05 0.870 48.4% +42 — -45 39.2% -0.72 4–4 (50%) 14–12 (54%) — 0.00
23 1999 1552 118.6 -2.72 +1.29 0.942 48.7% +21 -25 -7 46.0% -0.43 6–6 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — +1.34 2009 1619 133.1 +3.06 -3.98 0.906 49.1% +72 — — 47.2% -0.31 1–1 6–7 (46%) — +0.12
24 2000 1538 123.5 -0.49 +0.64 0.895 47.9% +26 — — 38.6% -0.75 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.42 2010 1554 99.5 +0.96 -3.80 0.646 45.7% — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.21
25 2001 1556 118.7 -2.71 -1.19 0.903 48.3% -16 — -31 44.3% -0.54 3–10 (23%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.11 2011 1585 114.2 +0.83 -1.90 0.916 49.0% +83 — — 40.0% -0.50 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.34
26 2002 1556 122.3 -2.06 -0.26 0.918 48.5% +28 — -90 38.9% -0.89 1–3 (25%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.65 2012 1645 118.7 -1.04 -2.78 0.781 46.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — -0.03
27 2003 1434 110.8 -4.02 -1.08 0.769 45.2% +49 +79 +15 26.7% -1.56 1–4 (20%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.14 2013 1640 108.4 0.00 +0.05 2.183 61.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.18
28 2004 1493 110.5 -0.62 +1.04 0.944 49.1% +47 — — 37.5% -0.38 1–1 — — -0.32 2014 1665 108.1 +3.55 -2.62 0.557 44.2% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.14
29 2005 1469 101.4 +0.98 -1.17 1.195 52.7% +44 — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 — — +0.37 2015 1605 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1430 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1433 89.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1469 105.8 -0.73 -1.29 0.989 49.4% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1449 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1440 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1432 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1631 117.9 -2.17 -0.11 0.899 48.0% +20 +21 -35 39.3% -0.78 15–34 (31%) 24–20 (55%) 99.3 +2.12 — 1682 125.4 +2.90 -4.66 0.907 48.9% +44 -14 +1 40.6% -0.54 11–19 (37%) 41–41 (50%) 100.6 -0.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.