H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Cecil Mamiit vs Luke Jensen H2H: 1-0
Cecil Mamiit holds a 1–0 lead over Luke Jensen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cecil Mamiit leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cecil Mamiit won the 2000 Memphis second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 60
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2000* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Cecil Mamiit | 7-5 6-2 | Luke Jensen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Luke Jensen | #962 | #168 | 114 | 1,540 | 12 | 43 | 21.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cecil Mamiit | Luke Jensen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #247 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #402 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #271 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #493 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #762 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #359 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #335 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #519 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |