H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Cecil Mamiit vs Michal Tabara H2H: 1-0
Cecil Mamiit holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Tabara in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cecil Mamiit leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cecil Mamiit won the 2002 Copenhagen fourth round 7-6(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 46
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2002* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Cecil Mamiit | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Michal Tabara | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michal Tabara | #1,290 | #47 | 773 | 1,686 | 39 | 52 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cecil Mamiit | Michal Tabara | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #202 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #123 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #96 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #64 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #210 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #172 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |