H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Cecil Mamiit vs Neville Godwin H2H: 0-1
Neville Godwin holds a 1–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Neville Godwin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Neville Godwin won the 1998 Canada Masters second round 6-4 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 51
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 1998* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Neville Godwin | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | Cecil Mamiit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Neville Godwin | #812 | #90 | 515 | 1,670 | 34 | 51 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cecil Mamiit | Neville Godwin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #487 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #275 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #208 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #111 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #180 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #150 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #210 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #123 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #128 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |