H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Cecil Mamiit vs Sam Warburg

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Cecil Mamiit vs Sam Warburg.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cecil Mamiit
PHI Age 50 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Sam Warburg
USA Age 43 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sam Warburg #139 7-6(0) 6-3 Cecil Mamiit #406 Match data Aug 4, 2008 Q1 Q Los Angeles Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cecil Mamiit #1,573 #72 625 1,631 48 95 33.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sam Warburg #814 #132 612 1,613 5 10 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cecil Mamiit Sam Warburg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1996 0–4 0.0% #200 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1997 2–7 22.2% #229 1,441 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,432 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1999 16–18 47.1% #93 1,552 0 0 2006 1–2 33.3% #174 1,482 0 0
24 2000 6–12 33.3% #121 1,537 0 0 2007 1–2 33.3% #176 1,514 0 0
25 2001 10–18 35.7% #111 1,555 0 0 2008 3–6 33.3% #143 1,595 0 0
26 2002 8–14 36.4% #111 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2003 3–15 16.7% #183 1,433 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 2004 1–3 25.0% #226 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #209 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2008 1–1 50.0% #462 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cecil Mamiit Sam Warburg
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1996 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 13 12 25 52.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2001 8 14 22 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 39 71 110 35.5% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 13 17 23.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/143 of Cecil Mamiit's and 15/15 of Sam Warburg's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cecil Mamiit Sam Warburg
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1996 3/4 2.7 5.3 45.4% 60.2% 51.2% 50.2% 42.9% 55.3% 33.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 8/9 4.4 2.0 59.6% 67.9% 47.4% 49.8% 55.1% 59.7% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 1/1 3.0 2.0 61.5% 70.8% 56.7% 42.9% 80.0% 65.4% 42.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 32/34 2.6 3.0 57.3% 65.9% 47.7% 50.8% 38.8% 58.0% 39.6% 2006 3/3 3.0 2.3 66.1% 62.1% 56.3% 31.0% 51.9% 60.1% 36.3%
24 2000 14/18 2.4 2.8 54.3% 67.2% 48.8% 56.2% 38.3% 59.0% 36.7% 2007 3/3 4.0 3.0 64.5% 72.1% 54.8% 63.3% 44.4% 65.8% 30.1%
25 2001 23/28 4.2 3.0 58.1% 67.3% 49.1% 61.8% 35.1% 59.7% 36.4% 2008 9/9 6.0 3.2 67.4% 69.9% 51.7% 60.8% 32.3% 63.8% 36.2%
26 2002 20/22 3.5 3.3 57.9% 66.7% 49.9% 60.6% 39.4% 59.5% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 18/18 1.8 2.7 62.6% 62.6% 42.3% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 4/4 3.8 1.8 51.5% 68.5% 51.2% 54.3% 24.2% 59.9% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 3/3 3.7 2.0 68.5% 74.3% 58.9% 36.4% 27.8% 69.5% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2/2 5.5 2.0 60.9% 72.3% 51.4% 61.1% 54.2% 63.8% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128/143 3.1 2.9 58.0% 66.4% 48.2% 54.5% 39.5% 58.8% 37.1% — 15/15 5.0 3.0 66.6% 68.8% 53.2% 55.3% 38.7% 63.5% 35.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cecil Mamiit Sam Warburg
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1996 1471 104.3 +1.39 -2.25 0.743 44.8% +17 — — 18.2% -2.27 0–2 1–1 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 1441 108.9 -1.33 -0.30 0.887 47.8% +21 — — 30.4% -1.17 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1998 1432 101.1 -0.76 -1.41 1.238 53.7% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 1552 118.6 -2.72 +1.29 0.942 48.7% +21 -25 -7 46.0% -0.43 6–6 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — +1.34 2006 1482 108.7 -0.78 +1.10 0.909 48.4% +29 — — 28.6% -0.57 1–0 0–1 — -0.20
24 2000 1538 123.5 -0.49 +0.64 0.895 47.9% +26 — — 38.6% -0.75 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.42 2007 1515 108.2 -0.87 -1.20 0.880 48.3% — — — 37.5% -0.88 0–1 — — +0.08
25 2001 1556 118.7 -2.71 -1.19 0.903 48.3% -16 — -31 44.3% -0.54 3–10 (23%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.11 2008 1596 110.7 +0.53 -0.13 1.001 49.9% -10 — — 30.4% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.42
26 2002 1556 122.3 -2.06 -0.26 0.918 48.5% +28 — -90 38.9% -0.89 1–3 (25%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.65 2009 1553 96.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1434 110.8 -4.02 -1.08 0.769 45.2% +49 +79 +15 26.7% -1.56 1–4 (20%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1493 110.5 -0.62 +1.04 0.944 49.1% +47 — — 37.5% -0.38 1–1 — — -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1469 101.4 +0.98 -1.17 1.195 52.7% +44 — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 — — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1430 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1433 89.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1469 105.8 -0.73 -1.29 0.989 49.4% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1449 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1440 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1432 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1631 117.9 -2.17 -0.11 0.899 48.0% +20 +21 -35 39.3% -0.78 15–34 (31%) 24–20 (55%) 99.3 +2.12 — 1613 109.6 -0.01 -0.10 0.958 49.2% 0 — — 31.6% -0.90 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +2.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.