H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Cecil Mamiit vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 1-0
Cecil Mamiit holds a 1–0 lead over Sebastien Lareau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cecil Mamiit leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cecil Mamiit won the 1999 Hong Kong third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PHI
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1999* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Cecil Mamiit | 7-5 6-3 | Sebastien Lareau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cecil Mamiit | #1,573 | #72 | 625 | 1,633 | 48 | 95 | 33.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sebastien Lareau | #1,018 | #76 | 622 | 1,719 | 82 | 120 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cecil Mamiit | Sebastien Lareau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #229 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–13 | 18.8% | #119 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,432 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #93 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #105 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #187 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #111 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #79 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #111 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #102 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #183 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #124 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #226 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #229 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #462 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |