H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Cecil Mamiit vs Sebastien Lareau H2H: 1-0

Cecil Mamiit holds a 1–0 lead over Sebastien Lareau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Cecil Mamiit leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cecil Mamiit won the 1999 Hong Kong Open round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cecil Mamiit
PHI Age 50 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Sebastien Lareau
CAN Age 53 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cecil Mamiit #84 7-5 6-3 Sebastien Lareau #109 Match data Apr 8, 1999* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cecil Mamiit #1,573 #72 625 1,631 48 95 33.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sebastien Lareau #1,018 #76 622 1,720 83 122 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cecil Mamiit Sebastien Lareau
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,493 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 1–1 50.0% #349 1,505 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1992 1–2 33.3% #197 1,501 0 0
20 1996 0–4 0.0% #200 1,471 0 0 1993 2–3 40.0% #131 1,531 0 0
21 1997 2–7 22.2% #229 1,441 0 0 1994 3–13 18.8% #119 1,482 0 0
22 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,432 0 0 1995 12–17 41.4% #136 1,557 0 0
23 1999 16–18 47.1% #93 1,552 0 0 1996 15–15 50.0% #105 1,676 0 0
24 2000 6–12 33.3% #121 1,537 0 0 1997 8–15 34.8% #187 1,591 0 0
25 2001 10–18 35.7% #111 1,555 0 0 1998 19–19 50.0% #79 1,657 0 0
26 2002 8–14 36.4% #111 1,555 0 0 1999 12–18 40.0% #102 1,616 0 0
27 2003 3–15 16.7% #183 1,433 0 0 2000 5–11 31.2% #124 1,597 0 0
28 2004 1–3 25.0% #226 1,492 0 0 2001 5–7 41.7% #229 1,522 0 0
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #209 1,469 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2008 1–1 50.0% #462 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cecil Mamiit Sebastien Lareau
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 1999 13 12 25 52.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1996 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 6 11 17 35.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2001 8 14 22 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1998 14 11 25 56.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1999 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
27 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2000 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2004 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 39 71 110 35.5% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 13 17 23.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — 57 80 137 41.6% 1 9 10 10.0% 12 19 31 38.7% 13 14 27 48.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/143 of Cecil Mamiit's and 180/204 of Sebastien Lareau's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cecil Mamiit Sebastien Lareau
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 2/2 13.0 6.5 44.7% 74.2% 46.6% 49.3% 21.8% 58.6% 38.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 3/3 3.0 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 47.5% 71.6% 33.3% 60.1% 43.6%
20 1996 3/4 2.7 5.3 45.4% 60.2% 51.2% 50.2% 42.9% 55.3% 33.2% 1993 2/5 6.5 12.0 49.5% 67.9% 34.2% 35.0% 40.3% 51.0% 33.7%
21 1997 8/9 4.4 2.0 59.6% 67.9% 47.4% 49.8% 55.1% 59.7% 35.8% 1994 14/16 7.1 6.0 54.3% 71.6% 41.9% 59.4% 34.6% 58.4% 35.9%
22 1998 1/1 3.0 2.0 61.5% 70.8% 56.7% 42.9% 80.0% 65.4% 42.9% 1995 28/29 8.4 5.7 56.5% 76.7% 43.5% 58.3% 37.7% 62.2% 36.7%
23 1999 32/34 2.6 3.0 57.3% 65.9% 47.7% 50.8% 38.8% 58.0% 39.6% 1996 26/30 6.1 4.0 59.9% 71.5% 50.8% 64.3% 47.9% 63.2% 39.9%
24 2000 14/18 2.4 2.8 54.3% 67.2% 48.8% 56.2% 38.3% 59.0% 36.7% 1997 23/23 3.8 6.1 61.6% 68.4% 40.6% 53.6% 40.6% 57.7% 38.5%
25 2001 23/28 4.2 3.0 58.1% 67.3% 49.1% 61.8% 35.1% 59.7% 36.4% 1998 32/38 7.6 3.8 66.4% 70.8% 45.2% 63.1% 40.7% 62.4% 37.7%
26 2002 20/22 3.5 3.3 57.9% 66.7% 49.9% 60.6% 39.4% 59.5% 37.2% 1999 25/30 6.4 3.0 61.4% 69.6% 51.7% 65.1% 48.9% 62.4% 35.8%
27 2003 18/18 1.8 2.7 62.6% 62.6% 42.3% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 34.4% 2000 13/16 6.2 3.8 62.2% 67.8% 49.9% 56.8% 39.7% 60.7% 35.5%
28 2004 4/4 3.8 1.8 51.5% 68.5% 51.2% 54.3% 24.2% 59.9% 37.9% 2001 12/12 4.4 3.0 61.3% 68.4% 46.5% 53.3% 34.0% 60.1% 33.5%
29 2005 3/3 3.7 2.0 68.5% 74.3% 58.9% 36.4% 27.8% 69.5% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2/2 5.5 2.0 60.9% 72.3% 51.4% 61.1% 54.2% 63.8% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128/143 3.1 2.9 58.0% 66.4% 48.2% 54.5% 39.5% 58.8% 37.1% — 180/205 6.5 4.5 60.5% 71.0% 46.1% 59.9% 41.1% 61.1% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cecil Mamiit Sebastien Lareau
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1494 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1505 103.4 +1.23 -0.86 0.927 48.0% — — — 50.0% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — +0.22
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1502 106.2 -0.04 +0.85 1.094 50.9% +40 — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 1–1 — +0.31
20 1996 1471 104.3 +1.39 -2.25 0.743 44.8% +17 — — 18.2% -2.27 0–2 1–1 — -0.21 1993 1531 110.6 -0.23 +0.55 0.687 43.1% — — +53 35.7% -1.21 1–0 2–0 — -0.06
21 1997 1441 108.9 -1.33 -0.30 0.887 47.8% +21 — — 30.4% -1.17 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.42 1994 1482 116.2 -2.66 -0.77 0.864 47.4% +32 — — 26.8% -1.29 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 99.4 +0.37
22 1998 1432 101.1 -0.76 -1.41 1.238 53.7% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.13 1995 1558 135.8 +0.09 -0.30 0.971 49.2% +40 — -29 40.8% -0.44 2–4 (33%) 5–6 (45%) 97.8 -0.07
23 1999 1552 118.6 -2.72 +1.29 0.942 48.7% +21 -25 -7 46.0% -0.43 6–6 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 105.5 +1.34 1996 1677 142.6 +0.84 +2.33 1.084 51.2% -11 — -78 51.5% +0.25 3–4 (43%) 2–4 (33%) 99.5 -1.30
24 2000 1538 123.5 -0.49 +0.64 0.895 47.9% +26 — — 38.6% -0.75 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 96.4 -0.42 1997 1591 120.1 -2.53 +0.23 0.910 48.2% +7 -69 +10 35.7% -0.84 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 99.1 -0.18
25 2001 1556 118.7 -2.71 -1.19 0.903 48.3% -16 — -31 44.3% -0.54 3–10 (23%) 5–4 (56%) 96.1 +1.11 1998 1658 133.0 +0.45 +0.31 1.002 49.8% +23 — -40 51.5% -0.07 5–6 (45%) 11–9 (55%) 103.4 +0.89
26 2002 1556 122.3 -2.06 -0.26 0.918 48.5% +28 — -90 38.9% -0.89 1–3 (25%) 6–1 (86%) 103.7 +0.65 1999 1617 128.1 +0.03 -1.37 0.950 49.1% +16 — +14 41.3% -0.45 6–7 (46%) 7–7 (50%) 100.5 +1.09
27 2003 1434 110.8 -4.02 -1.08 0.769 45.2% +49 +79 +15 26.7% -1.56 1–4 (20%) 4–4 (50%) 98.3 -0.14 2000 1598 117.1 -1.05 -1.01 0.904 48.4% +32 — +5 40.9% -0.57 0–5 (0%) 4–5 (44%) 94.2 +0.40
28 2004 1493 110.5 -0.62 +1.04 0.944 49.1% +47 — — 37.5% -0.38 1–1 — — -0.32 2001 1522 107.8 -0.57 -2.57 0.841 47.2% +60 — — 39.3% -0.89 3–1 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 102.9 +0.82
29 2005 1469 101.4 +0.98 -1.17 1.195 52.7% +44 — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 — — +0.37 2002 1503 93.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1430 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1433 89.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1469 105.8 -0.73 -1.29 0.989 49.4% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1449 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1440 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1432 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1631 117.9 -2.17 -0.11 0.899 48.0% +20 +21 -35 39.3% -0.78 15–34 (31%) 24–20 (55%) 99.3 +2.12 — 1721 133.2 -0.41 -0.11 0.955 49.1% +21 -69 -10 42.5% -0.47 25–35 (42%) 43–47 (48%) 100.9 +1.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.