H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Cecil Mamiit vs Todd Larkham H2H: 0-1

Todd Larkham holds a 1–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Todd Larkham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Larkham won the 2003 Australian Open round of 128 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(5) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cecil Mamiit
PHI Age 50 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Todd Larkham
AUS Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Larkham #235 6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(5) 6-4 Cecil Mamiit #107 Match data Jan 15, 2003* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cecil Mamiit #1,573 #72 625 1,631 48 95 33.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Todd Larkham #1,466 #136 274 1,607 3 14 17.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cecil Mamiit Todd Larkham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1996 0–4 0.0% #200 1,471 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1997 2–7 22.2% #229 1,441 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #265 1,478 0 0
22 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,432 0 0 1997 1–4 20.0% #189 1,493 0 0
23 1999 16–18 47.1% #93 1,552 0 0 1998 1–2 33.3% #247 1,485 0 0
24 2000 6–12 33.3% #121 1,537 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2001 10–18 35.7% #111 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2002 8–14 36.4% #111 1,555 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2003 3–15 16.7% #183 1,433 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #233 1,464 0 0
28 2004 1–3 25.0% #226 1,492 0 0 2003 1–4 20.0% #167 1,565 0 0
29 2005 1–2 33.3% #209 1,469 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #1001 1,562 0 0
32 2008 1–1 50.0% #462 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cecil Mamiit Todd Larkham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1996 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
23 1999 13 12 25 52.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 8 14 22 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2004 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 39 71 110 35.5% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 13 17 23.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — 1 9 10 10.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/143 of Cecil Mamiit's and 14/17 of Todd Larkham's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cecil Mamiit Todd Larkham
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1996 3/4 2.7 5.3 45.4% 60.2% 51.2% 50.2% 42.9% 55.3% 33.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 8/9 4.4 2.0 59.6% 67.9% 47.4% 49.8% 55.1% 59.7% 35.8% 1996 1/2 0.0 2.0 65.9% 46.4% 44.8% 66.7% 37.5% 45.9% 39.0%
22 1998 1/1 3.0 2.0 61.5% 70.8% 56.7% 42.9% 80.0% 65.4% 42.9% 1997 4/5 1.8 7.0 58.8% 62.1% 38.2% 51.0% 41.7% 52.2% 27.4%
23 1999 32/34 2.6 3.0 57.3% 65.9% 47.7% 50.8% 38.8% 58.0% 39.6% 1998 2/3 1.0 4.5 58.0% 63.8% 41.6% 56.1% 41.8% 54.5% 38.0%
24 2000 14/18 2.4 2.8 54.3% 67.2% 48.8% 56.2% 38.3% 59.0% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 23/28 4.2 3.0 58.1% 67.3% 49.1% 61.8% 35.1% 59.7% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 20/22 3.5 3.3 57.9% 66.7% 49.9% 60.6% 39.4% 59.5% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 18/18 1.8 2.7 62.6% 62.6% 42.3% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 34.4% 2002 1/1 3.0 5.0 66.0% 54.7% 45.5% 50.0% 16.7% 51.5% 30.0%
28 2004 4/4 3.8 1.8 51.5% 68.5% 51.2% 54.3% 24.2% 59.9% 37.9% 2003 5/5 2.6 5.2 66.0% 53.7% 39.4% 47.4% 31.3% 48.6% 36.2%
29 2005 3/3 3.7 2.0 68.5% 74.3% 58.9% 36.4% 27.8% 69.5% 36.5% 2004 1/1 2.0 3.0 71.6% 55.6% 44.0% 50.0% 25.0% 52.3% 32.5%
32 2008 2/2 5.5 2.0 60.9% 72.3% 51.4% 61.1% 54.2% 63.8% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128/143 3.1 2.9 58.0% 66.4% 48.2% 54.5% 39.5% 58.8% 37.1% — 14/17 1.9 5.2 63.2% 57.3% 40.5% 51.4% 34.7% 50.7% 33.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cecil Mamiit Todd Larkham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1996 1471 104.3 +1.39 -2.25 0.743 44.8% +17 — — 18.2% -2.27 0–2 1–1 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1997 1441 108.9 -1.33 -0.30 0.887 47.8% +21 — — 30.4% -1.17 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.42 1996 1479 106.0 -1.47 -1.25 0.720 43.1% — — — 28.6% -1.71 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.04
22 1998 1432 101.1 -0.76 -1.41 1.238 53.7% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.13 1997 1494 111.1 -0.73 -1.04 0.572 40.8% +1 — — 25.0% -2.13 — 0–1 — -0.50
23 1999 1552 118.6 -2.72 +1.29 0.942 48.7% +21 -25 -7 46.0% -0.43 6–6 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — +1.34 1998 1486 107.5 -1.57 +0.52 0.834 46.5% — — — 50.0% +0.30 0–2 — — +0.28
24 2000 1538 123.5 -0.49 +0.64 0.895 47.9% +26 — — 38.6% -0.75 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 1556 118.7 -2.71 -1.19 0.903 48.3% -16 — -31 44.3% -0.54 3–10 (23%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2002 1556 122.3 -2.06 -0.26 0.918 48.5% +28 — -90 38.9% -0.89 1–3 (25%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.65 2001 1475 100.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1434 110.8 -4.02 -1.08 0.769 45.2% +49 +79 +15 26.7% -1.56 1–4 (20%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.14 2002 1464 108.4 +1.68 +1.01 0.619 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — -0.18
28 2004 1493 110.5 -0.62 +1.04 0.944 49.1% +47 — — 37.5% -0.38 1–1 — — -0.32 2003 1566 110.5 -2.83 -1.03 0.705 42.5% -49 — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 1–1 — -0.30
29 2005 1469 101.4 +0.98 -1.17 1.195 52.7% +44 — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 — — +0.37 2004 1563 110.3 +1.88 +4.34 0.680 43.0% — — — 0.0% -3.33 — — — -0.27
30 2006 1430 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1433 89.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1469 105.8 -0.73 -1.29 0.989 49.4% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1449 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1440 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2011 1432 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1631 117.9 -2.17 -0.11 0.899 48.0% +20 +21 -35 39.3% -0.78 15–34 (31%) 24–20 (55%) 99.3 +2.12 — 1607 116.4 -1.29 -0.30 0.679 42.6% -24 — — 29.8% -1.63 0–5 (0%) 3–3 (50%) 94.5 -5.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.