H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Arnaud Boetsch H2H: 1-2

Arnaud Boetsch holds a 2–1 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Boetsch leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Arnaud Boetsch won the 1993 Toulouse final 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Arnaud Boetsch
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Arnaud Boetsch #24 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 Cedric Pioline #12 Match data Oct 10, 1993* F Toulouse ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Cedric Pioline #46 6-3 1-6 6-4 Arnaud Boetsch #35 Match data Oct 24, 1992* QF Montpellier Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Arnaud Boetsch #39 6-2 6-2 Cedric Pioline #44 Match data Oct 9, 1992* R16 Toulouse ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Arnaud Boetsch #1,323 #12 1,611 1,919 218 197 52.5% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Arnaud Boetsch
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #435 1,503 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #275 1,507 0 0
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0 1989 3–6 33.3% #212 1,508 0 0
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1990 2–4 33.3% #176 1,548 0 0
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 1991 22–18 55.0% #54 1,729 0 0
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0 1992 34–25 57.6% #27 1,876 0 0
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 1993 42–24 63.6% #20 1,901 0 2
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0 1994 24–24 50.0% #53 1,737 0 2
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0 1995 45–33 57.7% #14 1,887 0 3
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1 1996 28–26 51.9% #33 1,829 0 3
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2 1997 13–22 37.1% #106 1,646 0 3
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2 1998 2–7 22.2% #305 1,580 0 3
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3 1999 1–2 33.3% #580 1,575 0 3
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cedric Pioline Arnaud Boetsch
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
23 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1992 10 8 18 55.6% 8 8 16 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 7 19 63.2%
24 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 1993 18 9 27 66.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 12 7 19 63.2%
25 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6%
26 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1995 21 14 35 60.0% 12 11 23 52.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5%
27 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1996 12 10 22 54.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 13 8 21 61.9%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1997 6 8 14 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
30 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
31 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1% — 82 71 153 53.6% 49 60 109 45.0% 18 15 33 54.5% 69 51 120 57.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's and 347/392 of Arnaud Boetsch's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cedric Pioline Arnaud Boetsch
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4% 1991 36/40 2.7 3.2 60.7% 67.7% 51.4% 55.9% 44.0% 61.2% 40.9%
23 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9% 1992 54/59 4.9 2.6 58.3% 74.1% 53.2% 56.8% 40.3% 65.4% 38.6%
24 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4% 1993 57/66 4.5 3.2 58.4% 73.2% 51.4% 59.1% 44.7% 64.2% 41.2%
25 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9% 1994 44/48 4.1 2.6 56.5% 71.8% 51.1% 55.1% 41.9% 62.7% 37.8%
26 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6% 1995 71/78 4.5 3.5 54.1% 71.6% 51.1% 57.2% 39.0% 62.4% 39.8%
27 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6% 1996 46/54 4.9 3.2 53.5% 71.6% 52.4% 60.7% 49.2% 62.6% 37.8%
28 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6% 1997 29/35 1.7 3.4 57.1% 67.2% 47.2% 61.3% 40.0% 58.4% 39.9%
29 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3% 1998 7/9 1.9 4.7 49.5% 75.8% 50.5% 56.4% 40.7% 62.9% 37.6%
30 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2% 1999 3/3 4.0 3.7 50.9% 63.8% 48.1% 68.2% 34.3% 56.7% 45.0%
31 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2% — 347/415 4.1 3.1 56.5% 71.5% 51.3% 57.9% 42.5% 62.7% 39.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cedric Pioline Arnaud Boetsch
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1503 116.0 — — — — +39 — — 22.2% -1.78 — 0–1 — -0.09
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1508 103.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.75 0–1 1–0 — 0.00
20 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41 1989 1509 112.5 — — — — +35 +14 — 37.5% -0.88 0–1 0–1 — +0.54
21 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.10 1990 1549 116.2 — — — — — +12 — 40.0% 0.00 — — — -0.08
22 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.32 1991 1730 142.2 +1.08 +1.58 1.053 51.0% -45 -91 -98 55.1% +0.44 4–4 (50%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.29
23 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) — -1.91 1992 1877 150.7 +3.71 +0.34 1.116 51.6% -11 -234 -178 56.6% +0.59 9–7 (56%) 12–9 (57%) — -1.79
24 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) — -4.16 1993 1901 151.1 +2.46 +3.08 1.151 52.5% +3 -274 -57 59.6% +0.74 15–11 (58%) 11–10 (52%) — +0.16
25 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.27 1994 1737 140.7 +1.31 -0.28 1.015 50.2% +41 -66 — 50.9% +0.23 6–5 (55%) 10–13 (43%) — +0.52
26 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) — -3.16 1995 1888 150.5 +0.67 +2.49 1.058 50.8% -27 -92 -87 53.7% +0.26 16–8 (67%) 18–13 (58%) — -3.26
27 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.10 1996 1829 147.4 +0.71 +0.72 1.011 50.1% +50 -108 -93 52.6% +0.02 6–10 (38%) 14–11 (56%) — +0.69
28 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.00 1997 1647 131.6 -1.81 +1.61 0.960 49.2% +59 +72 +29 41.5% -0.29 3–2 (60%) 4–9 (31%) — -0.62
29 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.97 1998 1580 116.8 +1.12 -0.39 1.014 50.4% +54 — — 35.0% -0.60 0–2 0–4 (0%) — +0.06
30 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) — -2.23 1999 1576 112.3 -0.10 +0.59 1.040 50.7% — +100 — 37.5% +0.12 — — — +0.23
31 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) — -2.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84 — 1920 150.1 +1.36 +1.42 1.058 50.9% +11 -100 -88 52.2% +0.23 59–51 (54%) 76–78 (49%) 100.8 -0.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.