H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Arvind Parmar H2H: 0-1

Arvind Parmar holds a 1–0 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Arvind Parmar leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Arvind Parmar won the 2000 Eastbourne Open round of 32 7-5 7-6(3).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Arvind Parmar
GBR Age 48 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Arvind Parmar #151 7-5 7-6(3) Cedric Pioline #6 Match data Jun 22, 2000* R32 Eastbourne Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Arvind Parmar #1,507 #137 282 1,604 14 26 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Arvind Parmar
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% #250 1,523 0 0
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 2000 4–6 40.0% #154 1,555 0 0
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0 2001 2–3 40.0% #210 1,524 0 0
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 2002 2–3 40.0% #170 1,519 0 0
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0 2003 2–5 28.6% #166 1,516 0 0
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0 2004 1–6 14.3% #183 1,463 0 0
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2 2006 2–1 66.7% #331 1,462 0 0
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cedric Pioline Arvind Parmar
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1999 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2000 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
23 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2001 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
24 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 2002 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
25 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 2004 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2006 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1% — 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 11 17 28 39.3% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's and 36/40 of Arvind Parmar's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cedric Pioline Arvind Parmar
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 2/3 1.0 3.5 54.0% 64.8% 56.3% 45.2% — 61.8% 14.0%
22 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4% 2000 9/10 8.9 3.0 58.3% 77.3% 51.8% 52.6% 53.0% 66.2% 30.3%
23 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9% 2001 4/5 11.3 3.0 64.8% 72.9% 54.3% 61.8% 32.4% 66.2% 30.4%
24 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4% 2002 4/5 8.8 4.5 58.2% 76.7% 40.8% 41.7% 52.3% 62.1% 30.8%
25 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9% 2003 7/7 4.3 2.1 65.2% 67.4% 49.2% 59.8% 16.4% 61.1% 32.3%
26 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6% 2004 7/7 6.6 2.9 61.2% 67.5% 47.9% 43.7% 38.4% 59.9% 32.6%
27 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6% 2006 3/3 5.7 3.0 55.0% 78.5% 53.9% 77.8% 33.3% 67.4% 31.4%
29 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2% — 36/40 7.1 3.0 60.4% 72.3% 50.0% 53.8% 36.1% 63.4% 30.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cedric Pioline Arvind Parmar
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.10 1999 1523 101.6 -4.10 +2.68 0.367 39.2% — — +74 33.3% -1.22 — 1–1 — -0.19
22 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) — -0.32 2000 1556 119.6 +1.27 -2.23 0.899 48.3% -23 — +75 43.3% -0.47 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.01
23 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) — -1.91 2001 1524 100.8 +1.13 -0.45 0.899 49.0% — — +76 41.2% -0.65 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.27
24 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) — -4.16 2002 1520 102.3 -1.20 -0.61 0.813 46.4% — — +66 30.0% -1.10 0–1 1–1 — -0.20
25 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) — -0.27 2003 1517 104.0 -0.29 -2.15 0.830 46.7% +9 — +37 33.3% -1.22 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.17
26 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) — -3.16 2004 1464 111.0 -1.41 -0.24 0.813 46.0% +28 — +63 22.2% -1.28 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) — +0.02
27 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) — -1.10 2005 1483 107.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) — -2.00 2006 1463 104.2 -1.30 -2.76 0.964 49.9% +29 — — 57.1% 0.00 1–0 2–0 — +0.46
29 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) — -0.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) — -2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) — -2.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84 — 1605 111.8 -0.36 -1.22 0.830 47.0% +11 — +66 36.7% -0.85 7–9 (44%) 12–14 (46%) 101.8 +1.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.