H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Chris Woodruff H2H: 1-1

Cedric Pioline and Chris Woodruff are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on clay, while Chris Woodruff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2000 Italian Open round of 64 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Chris Woodruff
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cedric Pioline #5 6-1 6-1 Chris Woodruff #39 Match data May 10, 2000* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Chris Woodruff #53 7-6(2) 7-5 Cedric Pioline #17 Match data Aug 8, 1996* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5
Chris Woodruff #1,334 #29 1,273 1,838 108 106 50.5% 0 1 0 0 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Chris Woodruff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0 1993 1–2 33.3% #337 1,497 0 0
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1994 0–2 0.0% #300 1,481 0 0
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 1995 1–2 33.3% #135 1,485 0 0
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0 1996 20–18 52.6% #43 1,677 0 0
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 1997 35–21 62.5% #30 1,803 0 1
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #1324 1,787 0 1
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0 1999 22–19 53.7% #51 1,773 0 2
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1 2000 18–23 43.9% #67 1,695 0 2
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2 2001 11–17 39.3% #118 1,633 0 2
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2 2002 0–1 0.0% #496 1,593 0 2
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5 — — — — — — —
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cedric Pioline Chris Woodruff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4%
24 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 1997 22 11 33 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
25 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1999 11 11 22 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 2000 14 15 29 48.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2001 10 12 22 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1% — 67 65 132 50.8% 19 22 41 46.3% 10 10 20 50.0% 12 9 21 57.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's and 179/214 of Chris Woodruff's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Cedric Pioline Chris Woodruff
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 1/3 4.0 4.0 56.3% 71.1% 62.9% 71.4% 33.3% 67.5% 30.0%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 2/2 4.0 2.0 66.3% 57.1% 37.5% 52.3% 33.3% 50.9% 34.8%
22 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4% 1995 2/3 1.0 6.0 53.3% 61.4% 47.2% 42.8% 53.3% 54.8% 39.7%
23 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9% 1996 32/38 6.5 4.0 59.8% 72.0% 48.0% 61.6% 40.1% 62.3% 40.1%
24 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4% 1997 49/56 6.0 4.2 57.9% 74.0% 50.3% 54.5% 36.3% 64.0% 38.6%
25 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9% 1998 1/1 8.0 2.0 60.9% 64.3% 48.1% 57.1% 25.0% 58.0% 35.3%
26 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6% 1999 38/41 5.9 4.2 60.8% 73.5% 49.5% 58.5% 38.8% 64.0% 37.6%
27 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6% 2000 34/41 6.5 4.2 59.3% 72.4% 49.5% 52.9% 46.7% 63.0% 36.6%
28 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6% 2001 19/28 4.8 3.8 65.8% 67.7% 45.9% 58.6% 52.2% 60.2% 35.1%
29 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3% 2002 1/1 4.0 5.0 66.4% 70.7% 39.5% 70.0% 20.0% 60.2% 32.7%
30 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2% — 179/214 6.0 4.1 60.1% 72.1% 48.9% 56.8% 41.2% 62.8% 37.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cedric Pioline Chris Woodruff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41 1993 1497 110.8 +0.56 +4.55 0.923 48.8% +35 — — 40.0% -0.30 1–1 — — +0.06
21 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10 1994 1481 96.1 -2.29 +1.41 0.709 42.7% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.15
22 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32 1995 1486 109.6 +0.15 -0.21 0.879 47.1% +32 — — 28.6% -0.57 — 0–1 — -0.05
23 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91 1996 1678 138.2 +1.11 +1.61 1.063 51.3% -22 -65 -97 54.1% +0.48 6–10 (38%) 4–11 (27%) 94.9 +0.13
24 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16 1997 1804 146.3 +1.26 +1.60 1.073 51.1% +26 -96 -221 58.0% +0.54 13–6 (68%) 12–11 (52%) 106.7 -0.17
25 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27 1998 1787 106.1 +1.63 -0.13 0.840 46.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07
26 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16 1999 1774 139.1 +1.52 +0.86 1.046 50.9% +3 -96 -95 52.4% +0.37 7–5 (58%) 6–13 (32%) 97.6 -0.19
27 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10 2000 1695 134.9 +1.03 +0.26 0.990 49.9% +38 -67 -63 45.8% -0.07 9–7 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 97.0 -0.59
28 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00 2001 1634 127.7 -1.74 -0.84 0.882 48.5% +56 -83 -24 40.8% -0.51 3–4 (43%) 6–5 (55%) 99.5 -0.33
29 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97 2002 1593 96.1 -5.60 +0.39 0.822 46.5% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.14
30 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84 — 1838 142.0 +0.83 +0.91 1.016 50.4% +21 -81 -99 50.0% +0.15 39–34 (53%) 34–49 (41%) 97.5 -0.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.