H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC
Cedric Pioline vs J. Arrese H2H: 0-2
J. Arrese holds a 2–0 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, J. Arrese leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, J. Arrese won the 1994 Nice fourth round 3-6 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1994* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | J. Arrese | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1990* | San Remo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | J. Arrese | 6-4 6-2 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| J. Arrese | #775 | #23 | 1,077 | 1,831 | 213 | 207 | 50.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedric Pioline | J. Arrese | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #831 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #214 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #154 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #97 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #128 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #33 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #44 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #39 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #23 | 1,806 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,724 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #61 | 1,723 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #86 | 1,675 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #645 | 1,502 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |