H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Cedric Pioline vs Jacobo Diaz H2H: 0-1
Jacobo Diaz holds a 1–0 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jacobo Diaz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jacobo Diaz won the 1997 Bournemouth third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 50
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 1997* | Bournemouth | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jacobo Diaz | 7-5 6-3 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Jacobo Diaz | #833 | #68 | 622 | 1,628 | 28 | 62 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedric Pioline | Jacobo Diaz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #419 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #92 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #111 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #88 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #396 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #627 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |