H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 5-0

Cedric Pioline holds a 5–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 3–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2000 London fourth round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 25, 2000* London ATP 250 R16 Hard Cedric Pioline #10 6-3 6-4 Jeff Tarango #77 Match data
Feb 4, 1999* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Cedric Pioline #18 6-4 6-2 Jeff Tarango #53 Match data
Oct 22, 1997* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Cedric Pioline #25 7-5 4-6 6-4 Jeff Tarango #48 Match data
Mar 14, 1996* Copenhagen ATP 250 R32 Carpet Cedric Pioline #32 7-5 6-4 Jeff Tarango #83 Match data
Oct 8, 1993* Toulouse ATP 250 R16 Hard Cedric Pioline #12 6-1 7-6(3) Jeff Tarango #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2