H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Cedric Pioline vs Jeremy Bates H2H: 2-0
Cedric Pioline holds a 2–0 lead over Jeremy Bates in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1994 Toulouse fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 1994* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 6-1 6-1 | Jeremy Bates | Match data |
| Oct 15, 1993* | Bolzano | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Cedric Pioline | 7-6(4) 7-5 | Jeremy Bates | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Jeremy Bates | #1,314 | #54 | 700 | 1,717 | 116 | 174 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedric Pioline | Jeremy Bates | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #372 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #329 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #187 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #152 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #96 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #168 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #98 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #143 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |