H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Cedric Pioline vs John Fitzgerald H2H: 0-1

John Fitzgerald holds a 1–0 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, John Fitzgerald leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, John Fitzgerald won the 1992 Sydney International round of 32 6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(0).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
John Fitzgerald #184 6-7(2) 6-3 7-6(0) Cedric Pioline #51 Match data Jan 9, 1992* R32 Sydney International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,859 230 222 50.9% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Cedric Pioline John Fitzgerald
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,471 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,524 0 0
20 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1
21 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,697 0 2
22 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,791 0 4
23 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,787 0 5
24 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,666 0 5
25 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5
26 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5
27 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1 1988 36–20 64.3% #25 1,767 0 6
28 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,649 0 6
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,619 0 6
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,583 0 6
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,576 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,571 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Cedric Pioline John Fitzgerald
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 8 9 17 47.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 0 5 5 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0%
22 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1983 13 7 20 65.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
24 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0% 1985 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1987 10 10 20 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 1988 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 15 5 20 75.0%
28 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1989 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
29 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7% 1990 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1991 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
31 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1992 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1% — 92 97 189 48.7% 10 23 33 30.3% 87 64 151 57.6% 41 38 79 51.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Cedric Pioline John Fitzgerald
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1471 103.0 — — — — — — +9 23.1% -1.46 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.26
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1524 126.5 — — — — +8 — +37 38.2% -0.65 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 +0.18
20 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41 1981 1674 141.9 — — — — -72 -16 -14 50.8% +0.33 10–9 (53%) 9–11 (45%) 103.3 +0.46
21 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10 1982 1697 134.5 — — — — +13 -132 +11 52.3% +0.17 5–9 (36%) 9–6 (60%) 97.4 +1.60
22 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32 1983 1791 137.8 — — — — +37 -234 +1 59.1% +0.39 11–6 (65%) 17–9 (65%) 108.5 +0.37
23 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91 1984 1787 132.5 — — — — -28 — +73 53.8% +0.32 10–2 (83%) 9–13 (41%) 102.2 +1.73
24 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16 1985 1667 139.5 — — — — +50 — +110 47.6% +0.03 8–12 (40%) 5–10 (33%) 92.2 -2.02
25 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27 1986 1655 121.0 — — — — +23 -156 +127 41.5% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 10–3 (77%) 107.1 +0.24
26 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16 1987 1680 134.1 — — — — +18 — +72 51.6% +0.11 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) 97.5 +0.81
27 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10 1988 1768 135.8 — — — — -4 — +39 56.9% +0.40 15–3 (83%) 12–5 (71%) 114.7 +2.51
28 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00 1989 1649 123.1 — — — — -39 — +186 47.8% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 7–5 (58%) 97.6 +1.14
29 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97 1990 1587 122.0 — — — — +24 — +178 34.0% -1.00 5–4 (56%) 3–8 (27%) 99.6 -0.41
30 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23 1991 1610 118.4 — — — — -28 — +182 40.7% -0.74 1–1 0–2 — -0.77
31 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89 1992 1619 124.3 — — — — +19 — — 49.0% -0.18 2–2 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 103.9 +0.09
32 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75 1993 1583 106.1 — — — — +30 — — 42.3% -0.35 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.97
33 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76 1994 1577 99.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.23
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1571 104.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.21
Career — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84 — 1859 138.8 — — — — +2 -88 +60 50.0% +0.02 81–68 (54%) 101–82 (55%) 106.7 +1.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.