H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Cedric Pioline vs Jonas Svensson H2H: 1-1
Cedric Pioline and Jonas Svensson are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1993 Monte Carlo Masters quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 59
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 1993* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Clay | Cedric Pioline | 6-3 6-4 | Jonas Svensson | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1992* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jonas Svensson | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | Cedric Pioline | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Jonas Svensson | #1,304 | #10 | 1,420 | 1,972 | 252 | 200 | 55.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedric Pioline | Jonas Svensson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #831 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #228 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #103 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,835 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,736 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #81 | 1,718 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #33 | 1,767 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #183 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,620 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |