H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Cedric Pioline vs Kevin Curren H2H: 2-0
Cedric Pioline holds a 2–0 lead over Kevin Curren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Cedric Pioline leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1991 Berlin fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 68
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 1991* | Berlin | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Cedric Pioline | 6-3 6-2 | Kevin Curren | Match data |
| Oct 3, 1991* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Cedric Pioline | 6-4 6-7(13) 6-3 | Kevin Curren | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | #750 | #5 | 2,335 | 1,983 | 370 | 301 | 55.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Kevin Curren | #1,179 | #5 | 684 | 2,060 | 339 | 238 | 58.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Cedric Pioline | Kevin Curren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #91 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #118 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #51 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #55 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #33 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 51–27 | 65.4% | #10 | 1,936 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #17 | 1,941 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #51 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #9 | 1,925 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1995 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #54 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 32–17 | 65.3% | #15 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1996 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,805 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 25–13 | 65.8% | #10 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1997 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #18 | 1,886 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1998 | 38–26 | 59.4% | #18 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #37 | 1,807 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1999 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #13 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #23 | 1,822 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2000 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #16 | 1,760 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #20 | 1,793 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 2001 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #84 | 1,657 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #71 | 1,791 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 2002 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #119 | 1,618 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #58 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #147 | 1,653 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1178 | 1,631 | 0 | 5 |